2000
DOI: 10.1007/s005310000138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal structure and kinematics of Variscan thrust sheets in the valley of the Trubia River (Cantabrian Zone, NW Spain): regional tectonic implications

Abstract: The Variscan Belt in western Europe shows an arcuate geometry that is usually named Ibero-Armorican Arc. The nucleus of this arc, known as the Asturian Arc, comprises the Cantabrian Zone which is a foreland fold and thrust belt. The Trubia River area is located in the inflexion zone of the Asturian Arc, which is a strategic structural position for unraveling the geometry and kinematics of the Variscan thrust sheets and related folds. Geological mapping, construction of stratigraphic and structural cross sectio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the Variscan foreland in S-Sardinia, many features are similar: very low or non-metamorphic condition, the same deformation age (Early Carboniferous), lack of important magmatism and a polyphase structural history (Julivert 1987). Bulnes and Aller (2002) and Bulnes and Marcos (2001) highlights the close linkage between thrusts and folds, interpreted as fault-propagation folds deforming older thrusts and folds during progressive thrust imbrications and folding towards the foreland. An important difference is that in the Cantabrian Zone a significant change in tectonic transport direction is not described, and the finite deformational architecture is quite different, without the formation of triangle zone.…”
Section: Comparison With the Variscan Foreland Of S-europementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Compared to the Variscan foreland in S-Sardinia, many features are similar: very low or non-metamorphic condition, the same deformation age (Early Carboniferous), lack of important magmatism and a polyphase structural history (Julivert 1987). Bulnes and Aller (2002) and Bulnes and Marcos (2001) highlights the close linkage between thrusts and folds, interpreted as fault-propagation folds deforming older thrusts and folds during progressive thrust imbrications and folding towards the foreland. An important difference is that in the Cantabrian Zone a significant change in tectonic transport direction is not described, and the finite deformational architecture is quite different, without the formation of triangle zone.…”
Section: Comparison With the Variscan Foreland Of S-europementioning
confidence: 94%
“…Nevertheless, there are also longitudinal folds that were formed to balance totally or partially the displacement of thrusts (Alonso, 1987). Among them, fault-propagation folds are common in the north-western sector of the Cantabrian zone (Alonso et al, 1991;Alonso and Marcos, 1992;Bulnes and Marcos, 2001;Bulnes and Aller, 2002), and folds detached on footwall flats or folds associated with hanging-wall ramps have been described in the southern part of the Cantabrian zone (Alonso, 1987).…”
Section: Folds In the Cantabrian Zonementioning
confidence: 97%