2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00318-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal stochastic resonance in the coherence between spinal and cortical neuronal ensembles in the cat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
52
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of noise on synchronization have also been explored in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks (Wang et al, 2010) and other theoretical small-world networks (Perc, 2007(Perc, , 2008. In the somatosensory system, using afferent stimulation and simultaneously recording spinal and cortical evoked potentials in anesthetized cats, we reported that an intermediate level of tactile noise can enhance the coherence between the spinal and cortical evoked activity (Manjarrez et al, 2002b). In the visual system, Kitajo et al (2007) showed that the addition of noise can produce a significant phase synchronization of EEG signals from widely separated cortical areas.…”
Section: The Role Of the Peripheral Cutaneous Receptors And Of Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of noise on synchronization have also been explored in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks (Wang et al, 2010) and other theoretical small-world networks (Perc, 2007(Perc, , 2008. In the somatosensory system, using afferent stimulation and simultaneously recording spinal and cortical evoked potentials in anesthetized cats, we reported that an intermediate level of tactile noise can enhance the coherence between the spinal and cortical evoked activity (Manjarrez et al, 2002b). In the visual system, Kitajo et al (2007) showed that the addition of noise can produce a significant phase synchronization of EEG signals from widely separated cortical areas.…”
Section: The Role Of the Peripheral Cutaneous Receptors And Of Musclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The output of a noise generator (model 132, Wavetek, San Diego, CA) provided input to a closed-loop mechanical stimulator-transducer (Chubbuck 1966), which allowed measurements of the force and displacement of the applied stimuli. This method of tactile stimulation was previously reported by our laboratory (Manjarrez et al 2002(Manjarrez et al , 2003.…”
Section: Experimental Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SR-type effects have been demonstrated in physical and biological systems (Moss et al 2004). Commonly, SR has been studied in diverse sensory systems in which the signal and noise applied were of the same sensory modality (Aihara et al 2010;Collins et al 1996;Lindner et al 2004;Long et al 2004;Manjarrez et al 2002Manjarrez et al , 2003Mori and Kai 2002;Segundo et al 1994;Simonotto et al 1997;Winterer et al 1999;Zeng et al 2000); however, there are a few studies addressing the influence of noise within one sensory modality on the responses elicited by stimuli of another modality. The purpose of the present study was to analyze changes in the amplitude of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) when a continuous tactile noise was applied on the index finger.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the most studied noiseinduced phenomenon is the SR, which originally refers to the enhancement of information transfer in a nonlinear system at an optimal noise level in the presence of a weak periodic signal [23,24]. Remarkably, evidence of SR has been demonstrated in many experimental studies [25][26][27], indicating that noise may indeed participate into the signal transduction in neural systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%