2017
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Rotation in the Globular Cluster M53

Abstract: We present an analysis of the internal bulk rotation in the metal-poor globular cluster (GC) NGC 5024 (M53) using radial velocities (RVs) of individual cluster members. We use RV measurements from a previous abundance study of M53 done using the Hydra multi-object spectrograph on the WIYN 3.5 m telescope. The Hydra sample greatly increases the number of RVs available in the central regions of the cluster where the internal rotation is the strongest. The sample of cluster members is further increased through tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rotation present in our model is clearly evident in all projections. We wish to point out that the radial variation of the rotation axis might in some cases manifest itself as a counter-rotation of the outermost regions relative to the inner ones (see Boberg et al 2017 for a possible observational evidence of this effect). We stress, however, that a radial variation of the orientation of the rotation axis does not necessarily imply the presence of counter-rotation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rotation present in our model is clearly evident in all projections. We wish to point out that the radial variation of the rotation axis might in some cases manifest itself as a counter-rotation of the outermost regions relative to the inner ones (see Boberg et al 2017 for a possible observational evidence of this effect). We stress, however, that a radial variation of the orientation of the rotation axis does not necessarily imply the presence of counter-rotation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in performing such an assessment, the size and radial distribution of the sample of stars under consideration can have a significant impact. Often, all of the stars are taken into account, but previous observational and theoretical studies have shown that position angle of the rotation axis can vary as a function of the radial distance from the cluster centre (see e.g., Gebhardt et al 2000, Bianchini et al 2013, Boberg et al 2017, Tiongco et al 2018. Thus, in the case of multiple populations co-existing in a star cluster, if the populations are not yet spatially mixed, each population may also have a different position angle of its rotation axis; this effect has already been partly noted in M13 by Cordero et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, evidence of systemic rotation signatures is mounting, with the most recent results for nine GCs presented in Ferraro et al (2018a; but see also Bellazzini et al 2012;Fabricius et al 2014;Kacharov et al 2014;Kimmig et al 2015;Bellini et al 2017;Boberg et al 2017;Kamann et al 2018, and references therein). As shown by a number of theoretical studies (e.g., Fiestas et al 2006;Tiongco et al 2017; see also Figure 13), internal dynamical evolution and stellar escape cause a gradual loss of the initial cluster internal rotation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, deviations from the sharply truncated King phase space distribution (e.g., see the cases of NGC 1851, as studied by Olszewski et al 2009;Marino et al 2014, NGC 5694 by Correnti et al 2011;Bellazzini et al 2015, and several others, as discussed, e.g., by Carballo-Bello et al 2018), spherical symmetry (e.g., Chen & Chen 2010), and pressure isotropy (e.g., van de Ven et al 2006;Bellini et al 2014Bellini et al , 2017Watkins et al 2015) are found in a growing number of GGCs. Also the observational evidence of systemic rotation is increasing (e.g., Anderson & King 2003;Lane et al 2009Lane et al , 2010Bellazzini et al 2012;Bianchini et al 2013;Fabricius et al 2014;Kacharov et al 2014;Kimmig et al 2015;Lardo et al 2015;Bellini et al 2017;Boberg et al 2017;Cordero et al 2017;Ferraro et al 2018b;Kamann et al 2018), possibly suggesting that, when properly surveyed, the majority of GCs rotate at some level. In particular, Ferraro et al (2018b) investigated the intermediate/external region of 11 clusters, demonstrating the presence of internal rotation in almost all of them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%