2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal reinforcement of laminated duo beams of low-grade timber with GFRP sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A displacement rate of 1 mm/min was employed during testing. The results reached [53] were a mean Young's modulus of 21,610 MPa (CoV 4.43%) and a mean ultimate tensile strength of 455 Mpa (CoV 6.26%) for the UNI-1200 GFRP sheet.…”
Section: Gfrp Reinforcementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A displacement rate of 1 mm/min was employed during testing. The results reached [53] were a mean Young's modulus of 21,610 MPa (CoV 4.43%) and a mean ultimate tensile strength of 455 Mpa (CoV 6.26%) for the UNI-1200 GFRP sheet.…”
Section: Gfrp Reinforcementsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the paper presented in 2005 by Schober [ 44 ], an increase in bending stiffness of 5.86% in relation to unreinforced beams was obtained. Basterra et al [ 48 ] obtained an increase of 23% in load-bearing capacity and an increase of 12–15% in stiffness using internal GFRP reinforced for laminated duo beams of low-grade timber. Nowak et al [ 19 ] in 2013 observed an increase in the load-bearing capacity of beams reinforced with CFRP tapes ranging from 21% up to 79%.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From their observation, the fibres arranged in the longitudinal direction (zero direction) had the highest capacity of strength and along with findings by John and Lacroix (2000) that utilized U-shaped GFRP sheets to provide both shear and flexural reinforcement. Basterra et al (2017) tested the possibility of partial reinforcement of a glulam beam where the GFRP layer was placed over the tension zone by a low ratio of 1.07 and 1.6%. Their test results showed an average improvement of 12.1 to 14.7% in stiffness, while the moment capacity increased to 23%.…”
Section: Glass Fibre-reinforced Polymer (Gfrp)mentioning
confidence: 99%