2020
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2020.925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal regulation in compressible turbulent shear layers

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of the computational domain is twice as large than those in previous numerical simulations (Pantano & Sarkar 2002; Arun et al. 2019; Vadrot, Giauque & Corre 2020; Matsuno & Lele 2021). Further analysis in § 4 shows that the integral length scales and are sufficiently small compared with the length of the computational domain, ensuring that the self-similar growth of large-scale structures is not confined.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The size of the computational domain is twice as large than those in previous numerical simulations (Pantano & Sarkar 2002; Arun et al. 2019; Vadrot, Giauque & Corre 2020; Matsuno & Lele 2021). Further analysis in § 4 shows that the integral length scales and are sufficiently small compared with the length of the computational domain, ensuring that the self-similar growth of large-scale structures is not confined.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The Kolmogorov length scale is defined by It is listed in table 1 that the resolution parameter is in the range at the centreline, where is the grid length in each direction, indicating that the resolution of the present simulations is fine enough to resolve down to the order of the Kolmorgorov length scale of the flow (Pantano & Sarkar 2002; Arun et al. 2019; Matsuno & Lele 2021). It is noted that the Kolmogorov length scale achieves its minimum value at the centreline, and it increases slightly during the self-similar region of the mixing layer, seeing the detailed analysis in § 4.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, a quantitative measure of compressibility effects is the Mach number U/c s , where U is the velocity scale of the flow. In fact, a variety of Mach numbers, including convective Mach number (M c ), gradient Mach number (M g ) or turbulent Mach number (M t ), are introduced to quantify compressible turbulence (see, e.g., [1,[52][53][54]. The convective Mach number is determined through the flow general parameters and for the temporal shear layer between two free streams of fluid with the velocities U 1 = −U 2 = ∆U/2 and constant density and sound speed, is defined as…”
Section: Dns Of Compressible Turbulent Temporal Shear Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerodynamic sound generation is a major subject of fluid dynamics research and represents an enormous scientific and technological challenge. A simplified model to get physical insight into the mechanisms of aerodynamic sound generation in jets and other turbulent flows, is the compressible shear/mixing layer -the flow consisting of two parallel fluid streams with unequal velocities and, generally, densities as wellas it mimics shear layer regions of some natural and engineering non-uniform flows (see the recent paper by [1], and references therein). Over time, it has became clear that the flow turbulence is a mix of chaotic and coherent motions, focusing interest on coherent structures in exploration of aerodynamic sound sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%