2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004ja010832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal reconnection for northward interplanetary magnetic field

Abstract: [1] On the basis of magnetohydrodynamic simulation results for northward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) and significant dipole tilt, we describe internal reconnection processes that occur earthward of the magnetopause subsequent to magnetopause reconnection. We discuss the associated ionospheric signatures and show that the internal reconnection occurs not only between a summer lobe and a winter lobe field line but also between a summer lobe field line and a closed field line. The latter internal reconnec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(72 reference statements)
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dawn-side convection cell, however, is centered on regions with closed field lines. This circulation on closed field lines suggests that it is a "reciprocal" cell and that part of the reconnection driving it is between winter lobe field lines and over-draped summer lobe field lines [Crooker, 1992;Watanabe et al, 2005Watanabe et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Polar Cap Boundaries Observed By Dmspmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dawn-side convection cell, however, is centered on regions with closed field lines. This circulation on closed field lines suggests that it is a "reciprocal" cell and that part of the reconnection driving it is between winter lobe field lines and over-draped summer lobe field lines [Crooker, 1992;Watanabe et al, 2005Watanabe et al, , 2006.…”
Section: Polar Cap Boundaries Observed By Dmspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These over-draped field lines then merge with lobe field lines in the winter hemisphere through a process called "internal reconnection" [Crooker, 1992]. Watanabe et al [2005] predicted different geometric features for the reverse convection cells in the summer and winter hemisphere, as well as different particle precipitation features. In the summer hemisphere, where lobe field lines directly merge with the IMF, the traditional round NBZ cells called "lobe cells" form which circulate on open field lines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The University of Michigan's MHD code is the Block Adaptive Tree Solar-wind Roe-type Upwind Scheme (BAT-SRUS) (Powell et al, 1999b;Ridley et al, 2002; that can model the Earth's global magnetosphere (Kabin et al, 2003Vogt et al, 2004;Ridley et al, 2006;Watanabe et al, 2005;Ridley, 2007;, as well as the solar corona (Manchester et al, 2004b), the inner and outer heliosphere (Opher et al, 2003;Manchester et al, 2004c,a), Mercury (Kabin et al, 2000), Venus, Mars (Ma et al, 2004), Jupiter (Kabin et al, 2001), Saturn (Hansen et al, 2000(Hansen et al, , 2005, Uranus , Titan (Ma et al, 2009), andcomets (Gombosi et al, 1999). Because BATSRUS is a general MHD solver, and is not explicitly designed for solving a specific problem, it has many more options than typical magnetospheric MHD codes.…”
Section: Modeling the Magnetospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Watanabe et al [2004] further analyzed the consequences of reconnection between open and closed fields in the MHD model of Tanaka [1999] and, subsequently, in a model developed at the University of Michigan for northward IMF at solstice [ Watanabe et al , 2005]. In both papers, Watanabe et al [2004, 2005] use conceptual models to explain how reconnection between open and closed fields affects a transport of open flux. In subsequent work, Watanabe et al [2007] and Watanabe and Sofko [2008] develop these conceptual models in a rigorous way, substantially building upon a long history of null‐separator and current‐penetration models [e.g., Cowley , 1973; Alekseyev and Belen'kaya , 1983; Siscoe , 1988; Crooker et al , 1990; Siscoe et al , 2001], to demonstrate how interchange reconnection, although not by that name, fits into the larger context of familiar reconnection geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%