1984
DOI: 10.1086/337446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Phloem Development in Pharbitis nil Chois. (Convolvulaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations are also reported in Irish potato by Artschwager (1918), in Quisqualis indica by Baranetzky (1900) and in Combretum rotundifolium by Zozimo et al (2011). In contrast, Mikesell and Schroeder (1984) documented its origin after the differentiation of external phloem in Pharbitis nil of the Convolvulaceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar observations are also reported in Irish potato by Artschwager (1918), in Quisqualis indica by Baranetzky (1900) and in Combretum rotundifolium by Zozimo et al (2011). In contrast, Mikesell and Schroeder (1984) documented its origin after the differentiation of external phloem in Pharbitis nil of the Convolvulaceae.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…There is a controversy about the origin of internal phloem. According to earlier researchers, it may develop from various tissues such as: i) procambium (Scott & Brebner 1889;Baranetzky 1900;Kennedy & Crafts 1931;Zozimo et al 2011), ii) procambial derivatives (Fukuda 1967;Mikesell & Schroeder 1984;Patil et al 2009), or iii) dedifferentiation of the marginal pith cells (Esau 1938;Singh 1943;Patil & Rajput 2008;Patil et al 2009). In the present study internal protophloem originates from procambial derivatives while secondary internal phloem develops from an internal cambium.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the summaries in Metcalfe & Chalk (1950), it is interesting to note that cambial conversion of the inner portion of bicollateral bundles into medullary bundles is not known in Cucurbitaceae and Myrtales, but does occur in some members of Apocynaceae, Asclepiadaceae, Convolvulaceae, Gentianaceae, Loganiaceae (Buddleioideae excluded), Solanaceae, and one non-asterid family, Polygonaceae. Among these families, anomalous xylem production resulting in the formation of inverted medullary bundles has been reported sporadically, including the following (Metcalfe & Chalk 1950;and others, as cited): Apocynum (Holm 1910) and Willughbeia (Apocynaceae); Leptadenia (Asclepiadaceae) (Singh 1943); many genera of Convolvulaceae (Mikesell & Schroeder 1984;Carlquist & Hanson 1991); Gelsemium (Loganiaceae); Gentiana (Gentianaceae); Rumex (Polygonaceae) (Joshi 1936;Maheshwari 1929;Maheshwari & Singh 1942); and also Campsis (Bignoniaceae) (Handa 1936). The case of Gentiana is notable in that external phloem is described as weakly developed, much as was found in Croton glandulosus var.…”
Section: Internal Phloem and Medullary Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4-8, 12), the effect of in-version was greatest in pith cells (65% over that of controls), in tracheary elements (52%), and phloem cells (internal phloem, 50%; external phloem, 27%). The distribution of the phloem in the stem of Pharbitis nil has been described by Mikesell and Schroeder (1984). In pith cells and in tracheary elements, the increase was especially dramatic during the second day oftreatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%