2015
DOI: 10.1190/geo2014-0408.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal multiple prediction and removal using Marchenko autofocusing and seismic interferometry

Abstract: Standard seismic processing steps such as velocity analysis and reverse time migration (imaging) usually assume that all reflections are primaries: Multiples represent a source of coherent noise and must be suppressed to avoid imaging artifacts. Many suppression methods are relatively ineffective for internal multiples. We show how to predict and remove internal multiples using Marchenko autofocusing and seismic interferometry. We first show how internal multiples can theoretically be reconstructed in convolut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be shown that linear imaging of the redatumed data is equivalent to the imaging of primaries (Wapenaar et al, 2017). Hence, Marchenko imaging can also be interpreted as an internal multiple elimination process (Meles et al, 2015;van der Neut and Wapenaar, 2016;da Costa Filho et al, 2017). However, it has also been recently shown that novel imaging conditions can be derived for multiply reflected waves, given that a detailed model of the subsurface is available (Halliday and Curtis, 2010;Fleury and Vasconcelos, 2012;Ravasi et al, 2014Ravasi et al, , 2015b.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be shown that linear imaging of the redatumed data is equivalent to the imaging of primaries (Wapenaar et al, 2017). Hence, Marchenko imaging can also be interpreted as an internal multiple elimination process (Meles et al, 2015;van der Neut and Wapenaar, 2016;da Costa Filho et al, 2017). However, it has also been recently shown that novel imaging conditions can be derived for multiply reflected waves, given that a detailed model of the subsurface is available (Halliday and Curtis, 2010;Fleury and Vasconcelos, 2012;Ravasi et al, 2014Ravasi et al, , 2015b.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the combination of Marchenko redatuming and multidimensional convolution can be interpreted as a migration-demigration process, similar to other IME schemes. By predicting internal multiples at various depth levels in the subsurface and redatuming them to the acquisition level, an IME scheme can be derived (Meles et al, 2015). Alternatively, we can retrieve primary reflections at each depth level and redatum them to the acquisition level .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we avoid the migration-demigration process that is embedded in the approach of Meles et al (2015) by deriving an alternative Marchenko equation that can be evaluated directly at the acquisition level without a macro velocity model. Instead, we make use of a two-way traveltime surface of a single horizon that can be picked in the recorded data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method enables one to create virtual sources at any position inside a medium, but a macrovelocity model that describes the kinematics of the wavefield is nevertheless necessary. Examples of its application for internal multiple removal are shown by Meles et al (2015) and Ravasi et al (2016). However, velocity errors in the model affect the method to various degrees (Thorbecke et al, 2013;de Ridder et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%