2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-018-3515-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Multimodel Control for Nonlinear Overactuated Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for many physical systems, the inversion task isn't feasible. An approximate inverse is then required [26,27].…”
Section: The Dahlin Deadbeat Imc Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, for many physical systems, the inversion task isn't feasible. An approximate inverse is then required [26,27].…”
Section: The Dahlin Deadbeat Imc Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear models can't capture the dynamics of complex systems due to the presence of strong nonlinearities. The effects of these nonlinearities are mostly undesirable and can greatly affect the performance of controllers [26]. To tackle these challenges, multimodal approaches are emerging as promising alternatives to conventional linearization methods.…”
Section: Dahlin Deadbeat Internal Multimodel Control For Nonlinear Mi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The synthesis of an IMC controller that is equal to the inverse of the model expression and is fundamental to ensure perfect set-point tracking and this represents the basic problem of the IMC approach. In fact, the realization of the direct model inverse is difficult, and sometimes not possible to realize, for many physical systems [8,9]. This perfect controller cannot be implemented for the following reasons.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%