Internal Medicine Residents' Perceived Ability to Direct Patient Care: Impact of Gender and Experience

Abstract

Background: Physicians are expected to effect patient care by giving orders to members of a healthcare team. Because women are socialized to be less directive than men, the assertive behavior required of new physicians may be experienced differently by male and female residents. We sought to explore the effects of gender and year of training on residents' experiences and perceived ability to direct patient care. Methods: This was a mixed-methods, cross-sectional, descriptive study employing a quantitative written survey and qualitative interviews among internal medicine residents at an academic health center. Measurements included questionnaires and interviews about stress, assertiveness, and personal factors that influence their effectiveness in directing patient care. Analyses examined differences by gender and year of training. Results: One hundred residents were invited to participate; 65 returned questionnaires, and 16 of these residents were interviewed. Compared with male residents, female residents selected less assertive behaviors for clinical scenarios (p ϭ 0.047) and were more likely to perceive gender as inhibiting their ability to influence patient care (p Ͻ 0.01). Stress associated with being assertive varied more with experience than gender. Interviews corroborated these findings and supported the complexity of gender norms for behavior for female residents in a directive leadership position. Conclusions: When compared with male peers, female residents reported more gender issues in residency and chose less assertive behaviors in clinical scenarios. Experience mitigated some gender differences. Our findings suggest that discussion of the existing research on prescriptive gender norms for behavior and leadership may be warranted in resident orientation.

‘Speaking up’ about patient safety concerns and unprofessional behaviour among residents: validation of two scales

“…Second, we found that women residents had more negative perceptions of the SUC for professionalism than men. These findings may be due to gender-based differences of empowerment and confidence consistent with prior research 19 50. More research is needed to confirm, better understand and remedy these differences.…”

Speaking up about traditional and professionalism-related patient safety threats: a national survey of interns and residents

“…This may represent inherent personality differences between surgeons and internists,54 or elements of surgical versus medical culture that were not captured by the safety culture metrics in our study 55 56. In addition, male gender was associated with speaking up in the professionalism vignette but not in the traditional vignette, perhaps due to the more confrontational nature of addressing unprofessional behaviour21 22 and previously reported gender-based differences in confidence and empowerment 8 57. Finally, site differences persisted even after controlling for various patient safety-related climates and respondent characteristics and may reflect elements of organisational culture not captured in our study or the influence of regional differences in assertive communication 58.…”

The Associations Between Residents' Behavior and the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict MODE Instrument

“…In female medical students, an association was found between high reticence scores and low assertiveness scores. 30 A study of internal medicine residents 32 showed that female residents reported more gender issues and chose lessassertive behaviors in clinical scenarios. Despite remarkable social changes in the last 25 years, there has been relatively little change in stereotypical gender behavior; men are still expected to be ''assertive,'' and women are expected to be ''compassionate'' and ''yielding.''…”

“…33 Although female residents may be in positions of authority and may direct their patients' care, they may avoid using assertive styles that lead to potential ''social penalties'' for nonconformation to stereotypical female roles. 32 As a group, residents most commonly utilized accommodating styles, followed by avoiding styles. The least preferred conflict style was collaborating, followed by competing.…”