1977
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(77)90070-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal induction by the equatorial electrojet in India examined with surface and satellite geomagnetic observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The scatter is symmetrically distributed about the mean regression line, and the correlation coefficient is 0.86 in both Indian and American sectors. This compares favorably with the results of Yacob [1977], who found correlation coefficient of around 0.88 between the surface electrojet strength observed in the Indian region, extrapolated to the satellite height using a parabolic currentband model of electrojet, and the strength as obtained from satellite measurements. These correlations for the given number of points are significant at 99.9% level.…”
Section: Comparison Between Satellite and Ground Observationssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The scatter is symmetrically distributed about the mean regression line, and the correlation coefficient is 0.86 in both Indian and American sectors. This compares favorably with the results of Yacob [1977], who found correlation coefficient of around 0.88 between the surface electrojet strength observed in the Indian region, extrapolated to the satellite height using a parabolic currentband model of electrojet, and the strength as obtained from satellite measurements. These correlations for the given number of points are significant at 99.9% level.…”
Section: Comparison Between Satellite and Ground Observationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“… Fambitakoye and Mayaud [1976] found no measurable induction of the electrojet field in Central Africa, while Ducruix et al [1977] have shown theoretically that electrojet‐induced field is negligible at least along the noon meridian. Yacob [1977] examined internal induction by the EEJ in India with ground and Pogo satellite geomagnetic observations and found that its internal field contribution is small. This could be regarded as some justification for neglecting geomagnetic induction.…”
Section: Determination Of Eej Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for the 30° separation bins, the significance of correlation is greater than 95%, implying that the estimation of the correlation coefficients is meaningful. The correlation coefficient in the central bin is 0.94 (significance ∼= 1.0) which is higher than the previous estimates for the Indian sector as 0.86 by Jadhav et al [2002] who used Ørsted and 0.9 by Yacob [1977] who used POGO data for a similar analysis. Agu and Onwumechili [1981] also report a correlation of 0.8 from POGO over the Indian region.…”
Section: Correlation Between Satellite and Ground Datacontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Each observatory pair consists of one observatory close to the EEJ footprint and a second one outside of this area but both within the same longitude sector. The equatorial electrojet strength for an observatory pair is computed from the horizontal intensity, H, as Δ H EEJ − Δ H NonEEJ [see, e.g., Yacob , 1977; Alex and Mukherjee , 2001; Anderson et al , 2002], where Δ H is the variation of H from the mean midnight level for that observatory. Ideally, this differencing removes the core and large‐scale magnetospheric fields from the data, and on magnetically quiet days Δ H describes the daily variation of S q and EEJ plus their induced components.…”
Section: Observatory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation