2000
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.1999.0906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal hemipelvectomy for bone sarcomas in children and young adults: surgical considerations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
32
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Operation duration is also important to blood loss of pelvic tumour surgery. In most reports of primary or metastatic pelvic tumours, the average operation time was three to six hours and sometimes even more than ten hours [2,5,15,23]. In our study, the mean operation time was nearly four hours and time for reconstruction was around one hour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Operation duration is also important to blood loss of pelvic tumour surgery. In most reports of primary or metastatic pelvic tumours, the average operation time was three to six hours and sometimes even more than ten hours [2,5,15,23]. In our study, the mean operation time was nearly four hours and time for reconstruction was around one hour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…Although postoperative complications were common in our series (43%), most were minor and healed well with antibiotics and one I & D. Our major complications were not life-threatening and most required only I & D. Other studies report postoperative complication rates of 31% to 60% [3,8,28] for internal hemipelvectomy, with the highest incidences being infection (7%-50%) [1,4,8,10,22] and wound healing problems (13%-29%) [1,4,8,10,28]. Our infection rate was 20% and our wound complication rate also was 20%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…There have been only five previous reports of internal pelvic resections replaced with an allograft and a hip prosthesis (Table 3). It is difficult to compare those results with results of our series because of differences in tumor type, extent of resection, reconstruction methods, and length of followup [13]. Additionally, comparison of periacetabular reconstruction outcomes is hampered by differences in the source and treatment of the grafts [12,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%