1961
DOI: 10.1029/jz066i002p00581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal friction in shear and shear modulus of Solenhofen limestone over a frequency range of 107cycles per second

Abstract: The internal friction in shear and modulus of rigidity of dry Solenhofen limestone has been investigated over a frequency range from 4 cps to 10 Mc/s at room temperature. The results found are: (1) The rigidity modulus is constant ( U = 2.64 × 1011 dynes/cm2) to within ±2 per cent over the total frequency range covered, provided that the samples have the same density. (2) The shear internal friction (as measured by the logarithmic decrement) in the cycle‐per‐second frequency range is about a factor of 5 lower … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many data (Peselnick and Outerbridge 1961;Knopoff 1964) are also explained by the frictional dissipation mechanism. This mechanism, which yields a constant Q versus frequency, can be interpreted as frame inelasticity incorporated in Biot's (1956a,b) formulations.…”
Section: Vp (Iter) Vs (Iter) Vp (Meas) Vs (Meas)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Many data (Peselnick and Outerbridge 1961;Knopoff 1964) are also explained by the frictional dissipation mechanism. This mechanism, which yields a constant Q versus frequency, can be interpreted as frame inelasticity incorporated in Biot's (1956a,b) formulations.…”
Section: Vp (Iter) Vs (Iter) Vp (Meas) Vs (Meas)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the calculation, the only major assumption needed is that there is no velocity dispersion in dry rocks, which is supported by experiments (Peselnick and Outerbridge, 1961;Spencer, 1981 ) compressional velocity in the saturated rock at low-frequency limit; Vs/, shear velocity in the saturated rock at lowfrequency limit; V•h, compressional velocity in the saturated rock at high-frequency limit; and Vsh, shear velocity in the saturated rock at high-frequency limit. The high-frequency limit of the velocities in the Biot theory is used to calculate the high-frequency limit velocities and a is called the tortuosity factor, which is defined in the Biot theory as a nondimensional parameter dependent on the pore geometry of the porous medium.…”
Section: Biot Dispersion = ( Vs --Vo )/Vomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has not been rigorously tested for all rocks, many observations show that the difference between the ultrasonic and low-frequency velocities of dry sandstones was normally within the typical experimental accuracy of about 1 percent (e.g., Peselnick and Outerbridge, 1961;Spencer, 1981;Murphy et al, 1984;Batzle et al, 2006).…”
Section: Velocity Dispersion Mechanisms and Fl Uid Viscositymentioning
confidence: 97%