1979
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(79)90041-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal fixation of fractures of the proximal end of the radius in adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mason [1] first classified radial head fractures with a later modification by Johnston [6]. While Mason I fractures (marginal minimally displaced fracture) are primarily treated by conservative methods, Mason II (marginal fractures with displacement), and Mason III (comminuted) fractures are primarily treated by open reduction and internal fixation with screws or plates [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The unreconstructable Mason III and all Mason IV fractures are subjected to either radial head excision [19][20][21][22] or radial head replacement [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mason [1] first classified radial head fractures with a later modification by Johnston [6]. While Mason I fractures (marginal minimally displaced fracture) are primarily treated by conservative methods, Mason II (marginal fractures with displacement), and Mason III (comminuted) fractures are primarily treated by open reduction and internal fixation with screws or plates [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The unreconstructable Mason III and all Mason IV fractures are subjected to either radial head excision [19][20][21][22] or radial head replacement [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative merits of open reduction and internal fixation of the radial head fractures for maintenance of radio-capitellar contact have been reported, but the results are not universally consistent [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. We hypothesize that the associated injuries are under-diagnosed, under-treated and are under-estimated in terms of their relevance to the patient's final functional outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%