2013
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201207266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Dynamics of the Homotrimeric HIV‐1 Viral Coat Protein gp41 on Multiple Time Scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
76
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(45 reference statements)
12
76
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our SEC monomer result is consistent with the SEC of large ectodomain constructs done by other groups (Figure 1A from ref (48) and Figure S1 from ref (51)) although this monomer interpretation was typically not made by the authors of these papers. For these latter studies, the construct was NHR + native loop + CHR, FP + NHR + native loop + CHR + MPER + TM, or short NHR + short loop + short CHR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our SEC monomer result is consistent with the SEC of large ectodomain constructs done by other groups (Figure 1A from ref (48) and Figure S1 from ref (51)) although this monomer interpretation was typically not made by the authors of these papers. For these latter studies, the construct was NHR + native loop + CHR, FP + NHR + native loop + CHR + MPER + TM, or short NHR + short loop + short CHR.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Recently, we found that the CHR, MPER, and TM regions of a much longer gp41 construct (residues 512-705; see Fig. 1A) are subject to extensive conformational exchange processes in the presence of DPC (32). Although sedimentation equilibrium centrifugation and SEC-MALS data unambiguously showed that this gp41 remains trimeric under such conditions, the chemical shifts of the NHR residues in gp41 512-705 correlate much closer with the shifts of the Core S monomer (R 2 = 0.76 and 0.74 for the 1 H N and secondary 13 C α chemical shifts, respectively) than with the Core S trimer [R 2 = 0.24 (δ 1 H N ) and R 2 = 0.55 (Δδ 13 C α )] (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6C). Formation of these complexes then depends on a competition between intermolecular association of the NHR and CHR helices, including their FPPR and MPER extensions, and membrane binding of these lipophilic regions (32,34). Bundling of MPER with FPPR residues stabilizes the 6HB state (9) but only becomes kinetically accessible after these regions have progressed to a state of close spatial proximity (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ectodomain can also be hexameric or more highly aggregated and the oligomerization states depend on pH, protein sequence, and solution additives [7,8]. Protein monomers are also predominant at low pH for gp41 constructs that include the TM domain although it is not known whether or not the TM domains of the trimer dissociate during HIV/cell fusion [9]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%