1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199706)18:8<1043::aid-jcc8>3.3.co;2-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal coordinate modeling of DNA: Force field comparisons

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The Jumna internal coordinate program for modeling nucleic acids was extended to include the force field developed for the Amber program. This forms a bridge between internal and Cartesian coordinate modeling approaches. Using the extensive conformational mapping and substate search facilities available within Jumna, we rigorously compared the behavior of the different force fields and also of different continuum solvent models. The results, which help to explain trends seen in earlier minimization an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moving beyond statistical considerations, there have been several attempts to explore the conformation and energetics of DNA, using a variety of both backbone torsion angles and helicoidal parameters as effective degrees of freedom (12–15). For example, a study of the energetics of base stacking (16) replaced the backbone with methyl groups at the C1′ atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving beyond statistical considerations, there have been several attempts to explore the conformation and energetics of DNA, using a variety of both backbone torsion angles and helicoidal parameters as effective degrees of freedom (12–15). For example, a study of the energetics of base stacking (16) replaced the backbone with methyl groups at the C1′ atoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another alternative is FLEX, implemented in the program JUMNA, which may be considered a knowledge-based force field for nucleic acids. 255,256 JUMNA includes an internal coordinate representation of DNA, treating solvation with a sigmoidal dielectric screening term rather than with an explicit solvent model. Accordingly, JUMNA allows for conformational studies on oligonucleotides that are significantly larger than that currently accessible to all-atom, explicit solvent representations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, increases in computer power have led to the incorporation of more accurate and implicit solvent models, such as finite difference Poisson‐Boltzmann methods (Zacharias and Sklenar, ). Although it is not directly possible to mix and match the internal coordinate force fields with those designed for all‐atom simulation, the FLEX force field has been shown to agree well with the all‐atom nucleic acid force field described by Cornell et al () and Flatters et al (). For more information on the differences between internal coordinate and all‐atom representations, see UNIT .…”
Section: Issues In the Simulation Of Nucleic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 84%