1977
DOI: 10.1007/bf01881005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal conversion coefficients ofM4 transitions in125m, 127m, 129mTe decay

Abstract: The internal conversion coefficients have been measured using a high resolution low energy Ge(Li) detector for the following M4 transitions: lZSTe: 109.27 keV transition c~r=357_+ 11; RG method, ~27Te: 88.26 keV transition c~K=484+23; XPG method, ~29Te: 105.50 keV transition ~t~ = 213 + 10; XPG method.It is observed that these values are lower by 2.5-3.6% as compared with Hager and Seltzer's calculations. A comparison between experimental and theoretical eK and ~r values for eleven M4 transitions shows that th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
2
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first of these results, published in 1952, is statistically consistent with ours but the three more recent ones, appearing between 1977 and 1998, are lower by two or more of their standard deviations. In the case of α T 109 , the previous results are 357 (11) [17], 304 (17) [14] and 318(40) [16]. Once again, the earliest measurement, from 1977, is consistent with our result, as is the most recent 1998 result.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first of these results, published in 1952, is statistically consistent with ours but the three more recent ones, appearing between 1977 and 1998, are lower by two or more of their standard deviations. In the case of α T 109 , the previous results are 357 (11) [17], 304 (17) [14] and 318(40) [16]. Once again, the earliest measurement, from 1977, is consistent with our result, as is the most recent 1998 result.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…First, the difference in calculated α K values between models that do and do not include the vacancy is 3.4%, a small but experimentally discernible amount; and second, previous measurements [12][13][14][15][16] have consistently produced results that were significantly lower than both model calculations. The measured α T values have been more scattered but also tended to be low [14,16,17]. Of all these published measurements, the first appeared in 1952 and none is more recent than 1998, so it is reasonable to ask if these ICCs in 125 Te are really anomalous or simply victims of past experimental limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of these results, published in 1952, is statistically consistent with ours but the three more recent ones, appearing between 1977 and 1998, are lower by two or more of their standard deviations. In the case of α T 109 , the previous results are 357 (11) [17], 304(17) [14] and 318(40) [16]. Once again, the earliest measurement, from 1977, is consistent with our result, as is the most recent 1998 result.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…First, the difference in calculated α K values between models that do and do not include the vacancy is 3.4%, a small but experimentally discernible amount; and second, previous measurements [12][13][14][15][16] have consistently produced results that were significantly lower than both model calculations. The measured α T values have been more scattered but also tended to be low [14,16,17]. Of all these published measurements, the first appeared in 1952 and none is more recent than 1998, so it is reasonable to ask if these ICCs in 125 Te are really anomalous or simply due to past experimental limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of α K for this transition depends appreciably on whether the atomic vacancy is accounted for, there being a 3.7% difference between the values obtained with and without inclusion of the vacancy. The only previous reported measurement of the α K value [13] had an uncertainty of ±5%, which overlaps both calculated values. Our new result has ±1.2% precision and clearly distinguishes between the two options.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%