2012
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31824ddf07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal Carotid Artery in the Operative Plane of Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery

Abstract: The objective of this study was to measure the related parameters of intercarotid artery (ICA) in the operative plane of endonasal transsphenoidal approach for hypophyseal surgeries. Nine parameters of the ICA were examined in the computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) scan of 101 patients. The shortest distance between the middle point of the nasal columella and the projective point of the ICA (D(3)) was 85.50 (5.79) mm. The shortest distance between the anterior wall of the sphenoid sinus and the projective… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different methods of measuring the intercarotid distance have been used in the literature 1,2,6,17,22,23 , among them, the T1W gadolinium enhanced MRI. Although it was not a primary objective in our study, we could conclude that the intercarotid distance measurement using enhanced-MRI is a reproducible method to evaluate the intercarotid distance, with excellent inter-observer correlation (ICC = 0,93 for ICD1; ICC = 0,91 for ICD2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different methods of measuring the intercarotid distance have been used in the literature 1,2,6,17,22,23 , among them, the T1W gadolinium enhanced MRI. Although it was not a primary objective in our study, we could conclude that the intercarotid distance measurement using enhanced-MRI is a reproducible method to evaluate the intercarotid distance, with excellent inter-observer correlation (ICC = 0,93 for ICD1; ICC = 0,91 for ICD2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas, detailed preoperative planning with information regarding the sphenoid sinus, tumoral involvement of adjacent structures (cavernous sinus, suprasellar region, carotid arteries) and intercarotid distance (ICD) is critical. Despite that, there is little literature regarding the ICD at the parassellar region of the intracranial carotid arteries at its cavernous segment and its modifications due to the sellar pathologies, specially non-functioning pituitary adenomas 2,3,4,5,6 .Although vascular injuries have become less frequent over the years, with reports ranging from 0-3.8% 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20 , it is still considered one of the most important complications in the transsphenoidal approaches due to its potential hazardous effects and difficult management. Taking this into consideration, it is crucial that every surgeon knows exactly the carotid artery position and its relation to the lesion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 15 , 16 ] Although quantitative analysis of distances between CSICAs while facing endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches were conducted, these studies failed to discuss the direct association between CSICA morphology and pituitary adenoma. [ 4 , 5 , 11 , 15 19 ] Measurements from cadaveric study and those from image study existed significant difference. [ 16 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in the literature have correlated cadaveric and imaging findings to identify bony landmarks and the normal course of the ICA during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery; [17][18][19][20] nevertheless, work describing the anatomical relationship between the parasellar ICA and pituitary illustrates the enormous variation in anatomy between the patients. [21][22][23] An attempt to establish a formalized approach for facilitating safe transsphenoidal pituitary surgery by way of a radiological anatomical landmark checklist has been presented introducing the radiological "teddy bear" sign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%