Internal Audit of the Canadian Neonatal Network Data Collection System

Abstract

Background Neonatal databases worldwide have become a prominent tool for benchmarking, evaluation of outcomes, and quality improvement initiatives. We aimed to assess the precision of the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) database by conducting an internal audit of data extraction. Methods An audit was conducted in all 31 neonatal units participating in the CNN. Ninety-five data items selected for reabstraction were classified into categories (critical, important, less important) based on predefined agreement rates. Five records were randomly selected at each site for reabstraction, including one short (3–7 days), two medium (8–12 days), and two long (18–22 days) stay cases. Agreement rates for each data item were calculated for individual units and across the network. Results A total of 155 cases and 14,725 data fields were reabstracted. The overall agreement rates for critical, important, and less important data items were 98.0, 96.1, and 96.3%, respectively. Individual site variation for discrepancies ranged between 0.2 and 12.8% for all collected data items. Conclusion Neonatal data extraction within the CNN database structure exhibited high precision; thereby, revealing the reliability of our data abstraction for neonatal demographic, processes of care, and outcomes information. An independent external audit of data extraction would be beneficial.

Late Administration of Surfactant May Increase the Risk of Patent Ductus Arteriosus

“…However, the principles of surfactant administration may vary from country to country or between different guidelines (1,6,8,13,14). The available evidence suggests that if the patient needs surfactant administering it as early as possible is most beneficial (2,15).…”

Characteristics and outcomes of preterm neonates according to number of doses of surfactant received

“…The data were entered electronically and transmitted to the central coordinating center. The CNN database has been shown to have very high reliability and internal consistency [ 19 ]. Ethics approvals for this study were received from the Research Ethics Board at Mount Sinai Hospital and the Executive Committee of the CNN.…”

Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study

“…To assure data quality and adequacy, the data abstractor adhered to definitions from the CNN’s Abstractor’s Manual for clinical characteristics and outcomes of interest [25]. The database has been shown to have high reliability and accuracy [28]. Pharmacy data were repeatedly measured during and after the study period, and microbiology data were extracted by 2 independent sources to check for completeness and accuracy.…”