2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00047-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internal and external validation of predictive models: A simulation study of bias and precision in small samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
335
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 480 publications
(356 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
335
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The 0:632þ formula as proposed in Efron and Tibshirani (1997) for the misclassification error has been extended for the Brier score and the AUC, e.g. in Steyerberg et al (2001Steyerberg et al ( , 2003; Wehberg and Schumacher (2004); Gerds and Schumacher (2007);Jiang and Simon (2007).…”
Section: Internal Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 0:632þ formula as proposed in Efron and Tibshirani (1997) for the misclassification error has been extended for the Brier score and the AUC, e.g. in Steyerberg et al (2001Steyerberg et al ( , 2003; Wehberg and Schumacher (2004); Gerds and Schumacher (2007);Jiang and Simon (2007).…”
Section: Internal Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 A common problem in using prognostic systems is that the systems are not generalizable. 40 The systematic reviews of prognostic models for TBIs that have been published in the past 20 years have generated criticism regarding their clinical or methodological validities; 15,33 only a few studies have been subjected to extensive internal and external validations. 2,10,16,36,37,39,42 Few studies have analyzed the characteristics of patients who succumbed to early death after a TBI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external validation of models is essential for general applicability. 40 However, few studies perform this type of validation. 10,12,16,36,37,39,42 As in those publications, we found a worse discriminative ability in the validation set, although our model performed better than other recently published studies (0.88).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These serum lipid levels, adjusted for age, sex and body mass index (BMI) by multiple linear regression models, were then compared in current and non-smokers. The bootstrap method with 1000 replications was used to derive a 95% confidence interval (CI) using the bias corrected and accelerated (BCa) method, which was shown to be appropriate for small sample sizes because of its high internal and external validity (16). The effect of interactions between a current smoking habit and the AA genotype on LDL-C and HDL-C levels, adjusted for age, sex and BMI, was calculated, and the genotype distribution of the PTPN11 polymorphism was tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%