Internal and external green-blue agricultural water footprints of nations, and related water and land savings through trade

Abstract

Abstract. The need to increase food production for a growing world population makes an assessment of global agricultural water productivities and virtual water flows important. Using the hydrology and agro-biosphere model LPJmL, we quantify at 0.5 • resolution the amount of blue and green water (irrigation and precipitation water) needed to produce one unit of crop yield, for 11 of the world's major crop types. Based on these, we also quantify the agricultural water footprints (WFP) of all countries, for the period 1998-2002, distinguishing internal and external WFP (virtual water imported from other countries) and their blue and green components, respectively. Moreover, we calculate water savings and losses, and for the first time also land savings and losses, through international trade with these products. The consistent separation of blue and green water flows and footprints shows that green water globally dominates both the internal and external WFP (84 % of the global WFP and 94 % of the external WFP rely on green water). While no country ranks among the top ten with respect to all water footprints calculated here, Pakistan and Iran demonstrate high absolute and per capita blue WFP, and the US and India demonstrate high absolute green and blue WFPs. The external WFPs are relatively small (6 % of the total global blue WFP, 16 % of the total global green WFP). Nevertheless, current trade of the products considered here saves significant water volumes and land areas (∼263 km 3 and ∼41 Mha, respectively, equivalent to 5 % of the sowing area of the considered crops and 3.5 % of the annual precipitation on this area). Relating the proportions of external to internal blue/green WFP to the per capita WFPs allows recognizing that only a few countries consume more water from abroad than from their own territory and Correspondence to: M. Fader (mfader@pik-potsdam.de) have at the same time above-average WFPs. Thus, countries with high per capita water consumption affect mainly the water availability in their own country. Finally, this study finds that flows/savings of both virtual water and virtual land need to be analysed together, since they are intrinsically related.

The land footprint of the EU bioeconomy: Monitoring tools, gaps and needs

“…Land footprints have also been assessed as "virtual" land flows (e.g. Würtenberger et al 2006, van der Spleen 2009, von Witzke and Noleppa 2010, Köellner and van der Sleen 2011, Fader et al 2011, Qiang et al 2013, Meier et al 2014. Von Witzke and Noleppa (2010) define virtual land as the amount of land that is required to produce one unit of a given agricultural good.…”

Modeling water requirements of major crops and their responses to climate change in the North China Plain

“…Accordingly, CWR can be partitioned into crop blue water requirements (CBWR) and crop green water requirements (CGWR). Recently, a much large amount of global green water and blue water assessments have been reported with different hydrological models (Rost et al 2008;Hoff et al 2010;Fader et al 2011;Liu et al 2009;Liu and Yang 2010;Zang et al 2012;Zhang et al 2014). In addition, many studies have investigated global change impacts on crop yield and consumptive blue and green water use by establishing different scenarios Zang et al 2013;Chen et al 2014), but the impact of climate factors on CBWR and CGWR remains a rarely studied issue.…”

Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods

“…Applying the Leontief model (Leontief, 1936), as used in environmental-economic accounting methods, upstream flows can be tracked across countries. Physical accounting studies sometimes simplify by assuming the exporting country to be the producing country (Fader et al, 2011;Würtenberger et al, 2006). This assumption is problematic for crops that are not produced in the re-exporting country, or produced with yields differing from that of the country of origin.…”