2001
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270101015591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermolecular interactions in two (ferrocenylmethyl)benzimidazoles incorporating the 4-MeOC6H4and 3,4-(MeO)2C6H3groups: analysis of MeO—C—C distortions from ideal 120° geometry

Abstract: The title compounds, 1-ferrocenylmethyl-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-1H-benzimidazole, [Fe(C5H5)(C20H17N2O)], (I), and 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-ferrocenylmethyl-1H-benzimidazole, [Fe(C5H5)(C21H19N2O2)], (II), are model electroactive compounds for anion sensor and antimalarial applications. Distortions from the ideal 120 degrees angle about the MeO-C-C groups are evident, with angles of 115.1 (2) and 125.0 (2) degrees in (I), and 115.9 (2) and 124.6 (2) degrees, and 115.7 (2) and 125.1 (2) degrees in (II). The main int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The C-N distances, N-C-N and C-N-C angles of the title compounds are similar and comparable to the data reported for the related compounds [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Distortions from the ideal 120 o angle about the MeO-C-C groups in (2) are evident, with the average angles of 115.1(1) and 125.1 (1) o , which are consistent with the other benzimidazoles with the MeO group [18]. Packing diagrams of (1) and (2) are shown in figures 3 and 4, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The C-N distances, N-C-N and C-N-C angles of the title compounds are similar and comparable to the data reported for the related compounds [12][13][14][15][16][17]. Distortions from the ideal 120 o angle about the MeO-C-C groups in (2) are evident, with the average angles of 115.1(1) and 125.1 (1) o , which are consistent with the other benzimidazoles with the MeO group [18]. Packing diagrams of (1) and (2) are shown in figures 3 and 4, respectively.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The syn-torsion data is close to the average isophthaloyl (O C)C 6 H 4 (C=O) torsion angle noted previously (Evans & Gale, 2004;Mocilac & Gallagher, 2013, 2014Gallagher & Mocilac, 2021). In the four dimethoxypyrimidine rings, the methoxy groups all adopt similar conformations, as noted previously (Gallagher et al, 2001). The proximally related pyridine rings are almost orthogonal to one another at 87.00 (10), 87.09 (10) � and with the opposite (distal-related) pyridine rings almost parallel at 9.25 (11), 0.97 (11) � .…”
Section: Structural Commentarysupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The MeO group at atom C14 displays an OÐCÐC distortion, with O3Ð C14ÐC13/C15 angles of 115.60 (13) and 123.34 (13) (transoid to atom C13 and the C 5 chain). These distortions, especially that of the C Me ÐOÐCÐC torsion-angle orientation with respect to the OÐCÐC angle, have been commented on previously (Bruno et al, 2001;Gallagher et al, 2001;Wiedenfeld et al, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%