2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent volcanic activity detected in the Von Kármán crater on the farside of the Moon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface materials are interpreted as Eratosthenian ejecta materials, mostly originating from the nearby Finsen crater in the northeast of VK based on in‐situ visible and near‐infrared spectral observations of the Yutu‐2 rover (Gou et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2020) (Figure ). The empirical model also predicts that the thickness of ejecta deposits from Finsen impact events is comparable to the lunar regolith stratum (the green layer in Figure 3c) (Lai et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2021). Below the regolith layer, various scattering signals are present, along with several continuous LPR reflectors (red dash lines in Figure 3c): these horizontal features are interpreted as the base of ejecta delivered by multiple impact events (Lai et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surface materials are interpreted as Eratosthenian ejecta materials, mostly originating from the nearby Finsen crater in the northeast of VK based on in‐situ visible and near‐infrared spectral observations of the Yutu‐2 rover (Gou et al., 2020; Lin et al., 2020) (Figure ). The empirical model also predicts that the thickness of ejecta deposits from Finsen impact events is comparable to the lunar regolith stratum (the green layer in Figure 3c) (Lai et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2021). Below the regolith layer, various scattering signals are present, along with several continuous LPR reflectors (red dash lines in Figure 3c): these horizontal features are interpreted as the base of ejecta delivered by multiple impact events (Lai et al., 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The Lunar Penetrating Radar (LPR) onboard Chang'e‐4 (CE‐4) rover (Yutu‐2) has been surveying the shallow subsurface around its landing site on the lunar farside for over 2 years. It shows the stratigraphic structure up to 330–500 m deep (Lai et al., 2020; J. Zhang, Xu, et al., 2021), including a ∼12‐m thick regolith layer (Guo et al., 2021; Lai et al., 2019; Li et al., 2020; L. Zhang, Xu, et al., 2021), the basalt layers deposited by multiple lava eruption events (Lai et al., 2020; Yuan et al., 2021; L. Zhang et al., 2020), and evidence for surface modification events that occurred in the Von Kármán crater (VK) inside the South Pole‐Aitken (SPA) basin (Lu et al., 2021; Qiao et al., 2019; Xiao et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2021) (Figure S1). Here, we report the discovery of a 270‐m sized buried crater with clear diagnostic geomorphological features on the lunar farside using LPR data from the first 25 lunar days of the CE‐4 mission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the estimation of the iron-titanium abundances at the landing area, the penetrating depth of the low-frequency channel could reach ∼300-450 m (Zhang et al 2020(Zhang et al , 2021aLai et al 2020;Yuan et al 2021), depending on the permittivity value used for time-depth conversion. Compared to the low-frequency channel, the CE-4 LPR's high-frequency channel has a high range resolution, which is suited to deriving fine stratigraphic substructures in more detail at shallow depths (∼45 m) (Lai et al 2019;Li et al 2020;Zhang et al 2021b;Zhou et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflections within Stratum A and C are relatively strong, possibly due to inhomogeneous components, so we interpreted these two layers as ejecta deposits combining local materials and remote impact craters. The average thickness of Stratum A is 15 m. The reflectors above Stratum A have no obvious horizontal variations, which are not the focus of this work and have been analyzed and discussed in prior works (Ding et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2020; Zhang, Xu, et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflections within Stratum A and C are relatively strong, possibly due to inhomogeneous components, so we interpreted these two layers as ejecta deposits combining local materials and remote impact craters. The average thickness of Stratum A is 15 m. The reflectors above Stratum A have no obvious horizontal variations, which are not the focus of this work and have been analyzed and discussed in prior works(Ding et al, 2021;Yuan et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2020;Zhang, Xu, et al, 2021).The deeper Stratum D has a relatively strong reflection at a depth between 210 and 230 m throughout the Yutu-2 rover path, and the average thickness of Stratum D is 56 m. The boundary between stratum C and stratum D has a strong reflection, implying a density/porosity change at the interface. We observed a similarly sharp reflector relating to a buried crater wall, as shown in the CE-4 CH2 radargram, further, the inversed relative permittivity is consistent with the breccia samples(Lai et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%