2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3393-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent and perennial macroinvertebrate communities had similar richness but differed in species trait composition depending on flow duration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our P sites clearly had more total and EPT taxa across most sample months. While this observation conforms with Soria et al (2017), several researchers (e.g., Feminella 1996;Bonada et al 2007;Santos and Stevenson 2011;Grubbs 2011;Kelso and Entrekin 2018) have found comparable species richness between I and P streams (but their streams were considerably larger than the ones we studied). Although ephemeral streams in this region do not provide flowing habitat of sufficient duration for maintenance of macroinvertebrate populations, intermittent streams certainly do.…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our P sites clearly had more total and EPT taxa across most sample months. While this observation conforms with Soria et al (2017), several researchers (e.g., Feminella 1996;Bonada et al 2007;Santos and Stevenson 2011;Grubbs 2011;Kelso and Entrekin 2018) have found comparable species richness between I and P streams (but their streams were considerably larger than the ones we studied). Although ephemeral streams in this region do not provide flowing habitat of sufficient duration for maintenance of macroinvertebrate populations, intermittent streams certainly do.…”
Section: Macroinvertebrate Indicatorssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Rest-pools in the streambed also provide habitat for newly colonising and dispersing taxa with the opportunity to survive and persist through flow cessation [18,60,82,84]. Although in our findings, some species of Diptera, Annelida and Ephemeroptera occurred in higher proportions during the drying period (Figure 3b).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…In contrast, taxa adapted to low flow (OCH) disappear. Similar to Kelso and Entrekin [84], there is an increased richness and diversity of rheophilic taxa during rewetting. However, the richness and abundance during this (base flow) phase in our studied system were lower in comparison with the drying and rewetting conditions (Figure 4), which may be due to the disturbance by high flood in the river before the sampling dates (hyperrheic state).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Recognizing the suites of traits commonly associated with flow duration classes is useful for targeting potential indicators for SDAMs. Lifespan, time to reach maturity, mobility, and consistency of environmental requirements for life functions are traits of biotic indicators that are likely to discriminate among flow duration classes [131,132]. For example, while there are a few freshwater bivalves that are able to aestivate within sediments to withstand drying (e.g., Uniomerus tetralasmus, Toxolasma paulus, Musculium partumeium), most species are poorly adapted to long periods of drying because they have limited mobility and require flowing water for many life functions (e.g., respiration, filter-feeding, reproduction) [133].…”
Section: Mean Percent Of Months Drymentioning
confidence: 99%