1999
DOI: 10.1007/bf02461179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermingling and bumpiness: Exploring meaning making in the discourse of a science classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frameworks (Accountable Talk and Heuristic for Progressive Disciplinary Discourse) discussed earlier in the paper provide strong foundations in this area. Nonetheless, these frameworks focus on guidelines relative to the norms of effective science talk, but not how to realize those norms in the ''bumpiness'' of open-ended conversations (Varelas and Pineda, 1999).…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frameworks (Accountable Talk and Heuristic for Progressive Disciplinary Discourse) discussed earlier in the paper provide strong foundations in this area. Nonetheless, these frameworks focus on guidelines relative to the norms of effective science talk, but not how to realize those norms in the ''bumpiness'' of open-ended conversations (Varelas and Pineda, 1999).…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the lack of development of argument did not appear to be a barrier to the start of dialogue development. (Varelas & Pineda, 1999). This classroom appeared to be rather dominated by teacher talk, with much of the discussion being routed through him and therefore lacks this feature of dialogic classrooms as seen by Varelas and Pineda (1999).…”
Section: Two Themesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a dialogue-based class discussion, the students spend time probing the thinking of their peers as the class works toward constructing a common understanding (Varelas & Pineda, 1999). Dialogue goes much further than the common stereotype of "two people talking" (Burbles & Bruce, 2001).…”
Section: Dialoguementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations