1982
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9787.1982.tb00741.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermetropolitan Migration and Quality of Life*

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to assess the relative importance of economic and quality of life (QOL) factors as determinants of inter-metropolitan migration in the United States. The study is based on the generalized systemic gravity model of Alonso and on data from a sample of 25 SMSAs over the period 1965-1970. "The most striking feature of the empirical results is the apparent lack of importance of origin economic and QOL factors as determinants of outmigration.... On the other hand, the empirical results sug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(19 reference statements)
1
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the post-1970 'turnaround migration' was thought, in large part, to be a function of the attractive power of natural amenities in rural America (BROWN et al, 1997;FUGUITT and BROWN, 1990;HUMPHREY, 1980;JOHNSON, 1989;JOHNSON and BEALE, 1994;JOHNSON and PURDY, 1980). Further, previous work has identified natural amenities as latent factor inputs to the local production of goods and services (GRAVES, 1979(GRAVES, , 1980(GRAVES, , 1983KNAPP and GRAVES, 1989;MARCOUILLER, 1998;PORELL, 1982), with particular importance to rural regions. Rural 'growth engines' exist as complex interwoven markets including traditional primary factor inputs of land, labour, and capital combined with latent, or hidden, factor inputs characterized by natural amenities (for example, bucolic landscapes, open space, forests, water bodies, climate, etc.)…”
Section: Population Growth and Natural Amenitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the post-1970 'turnaround migration' was thought, in large part, to be a function of the attractive power of natural amenities in rural America (BROWN et al, 1997;FUGUITT and BROWN, 1990;HUMPHREY, 1980;JOHNSON, 1989;JOHNSON and BEALE, 1994;JOHNSON and PURDY, 1980). Further, previous work has identified natural amenities as latent factor inputs to the local production of goods and services (GRAVES, 1979(GRAVES, , 1980(GRAVES, , 1983KNAPP and GRAVES, 1989;MARCOUILLER, 1998;PORELL, 1982), with particular importance to rural regions. Rural 'growth engines' exist as complex interwoven markets including traditional primary factor inputs of land, labour, and capital combined with latent, or hidden, factor inputs characterized by natural amenities (for example, bucolic landscapes, open space, forests, water bodies, climate, etc.)…”
Section: Population Growth and Natural Amenitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies used county-level data. Some researchers chose other spatial resolutions, namely municipalities (Ali et al, 2007;Ferguson et al, 2007;Gottlieb, 1995;Lundgren, 2009), Bureau of Economic Analysis Economic Areas (Greenwood and Hunt, 1989), State Economic Areas (Williams, 1981), Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) census units (Porell, 1982) and census tracts (Boarnet et al, 2005). The spatial coverage ranges from several states, counties or communities (e.g.…”
Section: Study Sample and Amenity Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research on internal migration has focused primarily on the determinants of migration. A large body of literature has debated the relative importance of economic/job opportunities versus local amenities as determinants of migration, and ample empirical evidence seems to support both perspectives (e.g., PORELL, 1982;MUESER and GRAVES, 1995). In contrast, relatively little has been published in the regional-science literature regarding the consequences of migration, in terms of, for example, per-capita incomes in the destination areas (e.g., GREENWOOD, 1985;PLANE and BITTER, 1997;ARONSSON et al, 2001;CUSHING and POOT, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%