2001
DOI: 10.1053/stcs.2001.29972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate Survival and Predictors of Death After Surgical Ventricular Restoration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
59
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite early reports of high mortality with this technique, recent studies indicate a hospital mortality of Ͻ7% in patients with end stage ICM. [1][2][3][4] In our previous studies, we demonstrated that LV reconstruction surgery combined with coronary revascularization for patients with ICM could significantly reduce symptoms in patients refractory to medical therapy and that an LV end-diastolic volume Ͻ150 mL after surgery predicted a favorable short term outcome. 3,5 In contrast, persistent mitral regurgitation (MR) was found to be a strong predictor of poor long-term prognosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite early reports of high mortality with this technique, recent studies indicate a hospital mortality of Ͻ7% in patients with end stage ICM. [1][2][3][4] In our previous studies, we demonstrated that LV reconstruction surgery combined with coronary revascularization for patients with ICM could significantly reduce symptoms in patients refractory to medical therapy and that an LV end-diastolic volume Ͻ150 mL after surgery predicted a favorable short term outcome. 3,5 In contrast, persistent mitral regurgitation (MR) was found to be a strong predictor of poor long-term prognosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22) Additionally, LV dilatation showed the correlation between increased LV volumes after myocardial infarction with increased mortality. These findings were subsequently reconfirmed by Di Donato, et al and by Dor, et al 11,12) In 2013, Liu and associates studied the patients who underwent either isolated CABG or CABG/ SVR into two different groups according to the pre-operative LVESVI. 23) In their report, the effective revascularization is most …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Since pre-operative LVESVI (>100 ml/m 2 ) was demonstrated to be an independent predictor of long-term mortality following isolated CABG, SVR has been concomitantly performed in patients with a dilated LV due to ICM. 4,11) According to these reports, we have been performing SVR in patients with ICM and large LVESVI (>100 ml/m 2 ). Dor and associates documented that cardiac geometric and functional data such as LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LVESVI and EF were improved at early and 1 year after the operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 In a study of 48 patients with EF <0.3 and LVESVI <100 ml/m 2 , Cox's proportional hazards model identified LVR and renal failure as independent factors that affected actuarial survival with odds ratios of 0.28 and 3.64, respectively (P<0.05). The 5-year actuarial survival (Kaplan-Meier) was significantly greater following LVR (90±11%) compared with isolated CABG (53±17%).…”
Section: Left Ventricular (Lv) Restoration and Ischemic Cardiomyopathmentioning
confidence: 99%