1992
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(92)90254-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions with G-matrix potentials and cross sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the microscopic Brueckner approach, it can be calculated from various models either non-relativistically or relativistically, see, e.g., Refs. [239,400,408,433,434]. Theoretically, approximations have to be made to render the calculations feasible.…”
Section: Nn Cross Sections In Neutron-rich Matter Within the Relativimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the microscopic Brueckner approach, it can be calculated from various models either non-relativistically or relativistically, see, e.g., Refs. [239,400,408,433,434]. Theoretically, approximations have to be made to render the calculations feasible.…”
Section: Nn Cross Sections In Neutron-rich Matter Within the Relativimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few attempts have been made to include realistic G-matrices into a transport description, see e.g. the work of the Tübingen group [47]. In many other cases, free or in medium corrected cross sections are used together with parameterizations of the mean-field (e.g.…”
Section: (27)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The collective transverse flow in heavy ion collisions has been used extensively over the past three decades to gain insight into the properties of nuclear matter at different thermodynamical conditions [1][2][3]. The dependence of transverse flow to various entrance channel parameters like incident energy [4], system size [2], colliding geometry [5,6], mass asymmetry [7] and isospin of the reacting nuclei [5,8] is well established experimentally as well as theoretically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%