2021
DOI: 10.1055/a-1485-2372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate-Dose versus Standard-Dose Prophylactic Anticoagulation in Patients with COVID-19 Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: 90-Day Results from the INSPIRATION Randomized Trial

Abstract: Background: Thrombotic complications are considered among the main extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. The optimal type and duration of prophylactic antithrombotic therapy in these patients remain unknown. Methods: This manuscript reports the final (90-day) results of the Intermediate versus Standard-dose Prophylactic anticoagulation In cRitically-ill pATIents with COVID-19: An opeN label randomized controlled trial (INSPIRATION) study. Patients with COVID-19 admitted to intensive care were randomized t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our systematic literature search retrieved 1881 hits, of which 1045 were unique (titles retrieved after removing duplications). After screening against inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight randomized controlled trials [ [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] ] were included ( Fig. 1 ), with a total of 5405 patients (2746 patients randomized to the intermediate or therapeutic anticoagulation group, and 2659 patients randomized to the prophylactic anticoagulation group).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our systematic literature search retrieved 1881 hits, of which 1045 were unique (titles retrieved after removing duplications). After screening against inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight randomized controlled trials [ [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] ] were included ( Fig. 1 ), with a total of 5405 patients (2746 patients randomized to the intermediate or therapeutic anticoagulation group, and 2659 patients randomized to the prophylactic anticoagulation group).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ), with a total of 5405 patients (2746 patients randomized to the intermediate or therapeutic anticoagulation group, and 2659 patients randomized to the prophylactic anticoagulation group). Four of the included randomized trials in this systematic review and meta-analysis were from Iran (n = 1) [ 7 ], the United States (n = 2) [ 8 , 12 ], and Brazil (n = 2) [ 5 , 9 ], respectively, and one of the included randomized trial [ 11 ] was a global trial performed in six countries. In contrast, the remaining two randomized trials [ 6 , 10 ] were international multiplatform randomized controlled trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 Administration of anticoagulants is of huge importance for thrombotic disease prevention in COVID-19 patients, and heparins (unfractionated or low-molecular weight heparins) are the currently recommended agents for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. 25 , 26 Nevertheless, excessive doses and/or an accumulative effect of heparins may favor bleeding, mainly in the hemorrhagic phase of the infection disease when multiorgan failure also occurs. Therefore, from patients' point of view, anticoagulants and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines share their capacity to induce thrombosis as well as bleeding.…”
Section: Anticoagulation and Sars-cov-2 Vaccinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12]. Auch im 90-Tage-Follow-up änderte sich diese Schlussfolgerung nicht [13]. Für Patienten mit einem leichten bzw.…”
Section: Stand Der Dingeunclassified