1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(199702)28:2<98::aid-mpo3>3.0.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediate-dose methotrexate versus cranial irradiation in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A ten-year follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21][22][23] In successive protocols conducted at St Jude, the cumulative dose of high-dose methotrexate has increased; the greater dose intensity conceivably contributes to the better outcome. Although the cumulative dose of high-dose methotrexate used during the Total X study (15 g/m 2 ) was higher than that used in Total XI or XII (4 and 7.5 g/m 2 , respectively), each individual dose (1 g/m 2 ) was lower than that used during later studies (2 g/m 2 or more) and was followed by higher and more frequent Overt testicular disease of ALL N Hijiya et al doses of leucovorin than those used during later studies, 8 which may have caused the undesirable rescue of leukemic cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21][22][23] In successive protocols conducted at St Jude, the cumulative dose of high-dose methotrexate has increased; the greater dose intensity conceivably contributes to the better outcome. Although the cumulative dose of high-dose methotrexate used during the Total X study (15 g/m 2 ) was higher than that used in Total XI or XII (4 and 7.5 g/m 2 , respectively), each individual dose (1 g/m 2 ) was lower than that used during later studies (2 g/m 2 or more) and was followed by higher and more frequent Overt testicular disease of ALL N Hijiya et al doses of leucovorin than those used during later studies, 8 which may have caused the undesirable rescue of leukemic cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of intrathecal methotrexate and high-dose intravenous methotrexate in selected populations now results in low CNS relapse rates (4%). Continuous complete remission survival is the same as for patients treated with prophylactic radiotherapy, mainly because isolated CNS relapses can be effectively treated [9]. Late recurrences in the CSF should be recognized and treated early, because they are potentially curable.…”
Section: Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All had previously been randomized to receive either 2400 cGy and intrathecal methotrexate, or intermediate dose systemic methotrexate with intrathecal methotrexate. A 12-year follow-up of these patients suggested that both treatments were associated with similar outcomes in terms of survival [81]. Of 202 survivors who were eligible for the study, 60% were located and 94% of these agreed to take part.…”
Section: Cns Irradiation Vs No High Dose Methotrexatementioning
confidence: 99%