2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpaa.2008.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermediary rings in normal pairs

Abstract: Communicated by E.M. Friedlander MSC: Primary: 13B02 secondary: 13C15 13A17 13A18 13B25 13E05 a b s t r a c t We establish in this paper a result that gives the number of intermediary rings between R and S where (R, S) is a normal pair of rings. This result answers in particular a question which was left open in [A. Jaballah, Finiteness of the set of intermediary rings in a normal pair, Saintama Math. J. 17 (1999) 59-61]. Further applications are also given.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is Several papers have provided approximations for the cardinality |[R, S]| in the context of normal pairs with finite supports [3][4][5]12]. Recently, [6] has presented an effective algorithm that enables us to compute the exact value of |[R, S]|.…”
Section: Let a = Supp(s/r) ∪ {O} Ordered By Inclusion Where O Is Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is Several papers have provided approximations for the cardinality |[R, S]| in the context of normal pairs with finite supports [3][4][5]12]. Recently, [6] has presented an effective algorithm that enables us to compute the exact value of |[R, S]|.…”
Section: Let a = Supp(s/r) ∪ {O} Ordered By Inclusion Where O Is Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we collect and recall some results from [4]. Let (R, S) be a normal pair and Supp(S/R) the ordered set…”
Section: Some Basic Properties Of Normal Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper is a sequel to [4], we adopt the conventions that each ring considered is commutative, with unit and an inclusion (extension) of rings signifies that the smaller ring is a subring of the larger and possesses the same multiplicative identity. Throughout this paper, Spec(R) denotes the set of prime ideals of an integral domain R, and Max(R) denotes the set of its maximal ideals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He proved that if R is quasilocal, then (R, S ) is a normal pair if and only if there exists a divided prime ideal P of R (that is, PR P = P) such that S = R P and R/P is a valuation ring [7,Theorem 1]. Recently, normal pairs have received considerable attention (see [3,5,9,16] In recent years, there has been increasing interest in ring extensions R ⊂ S satisfying FIP (finite intermediate rings property) or FCP (finite chain property). Following [1], the extension R ⊂ S is said to satisfy FIP if there are only a finite number of rings contained between R and S .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then[3, Corollary 2.6] ensures that S 1 ⊆ S and R * ⊂ S 1 is a minimal extension with crucial maximal ideal M. As, in addition, R * is the integral closure of J in S 1 and M C, then, according to Proposition 2.5, [J, S 1…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%