1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-8343(98)00057-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“INTERMED”: a method to assess health service needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
113
0
5

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
113
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…During the initial consultation (month 0), clinicians used the INTERMED, a validated observer-rated instrument for assessing case complexity and health care needs using a biopsychosocial model, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] to stratify patients into either the regular-intensity (score of 0 through 20) or high-intensity (score of 21 or more) program. For the regular-intensity program, consultations were conducted intermittently at enrollment (month 0) and months 1, 4, and 6.…”
Section: Program Evaluation Design and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the initial consultation (month 0), clinicians used the INTERMED, a validated observer-rated instrument for assessing case complexity and health care needs using a biopsychosocial model, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] to stratify patients into either the regular-intensity (score of 0 through 20) or high-intensity (score of 21 or more) program. For the regular-intensity program, consultations were conducted intermittently at enrollment (month 0) and months 1, 4, and 6.…”
Section: Program Evaluation Design and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive test would thus have to be combined with a clinical assessment or a structured interview, as for example the COMPRI [51], to make psychiatric diagnoses [18,52,53]. A later paper will explore the usefulness of an extended scale that includes separate depression and anxiety subscales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 From an extensive list of potential risk factors for complexity mentioned in the literature, we developed a risk score, linearly related to all complexity indicators across the national samples. Using this risk score together with a method of integrating diagnostic information, [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] we present an alternative way of screening for patients requiring complex care in the general hospital. 31 The main advantages of this approach are that health care becomes preventive and can be planned at admission, as opposed to reacting to patient complications in the course of hospitalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%