2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermanual transfer of sensorimotor memory for grip force when lifting objects: The role of wrist angulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor learning is a set of internal processes that cannot be measured directly, but is instead inferred based on behavior (Schmidt & Lee, 1999; Shumway-Cook & Woollacott, 2007). Behavioral changes in components of naturalistic movement, like point-to-point reaching (Kluzik, Diedrichsen, Shadmehr, & Bastian, 2008; Krakauer, et al, 2000; Mattar & Ostry, 2010; Pearson, Krakauer, & Mazzoni, 2010; Pennel, Coello, & Orliaguet, 2002; Seidler, 2007; Shadmehr & Mussa-Ivaldi, 1994) or grasping (Albert, Santello, & Gordon, 2009; Bensmail, Sarfeld, Fink, & Nowak, 2010; Camus, Ragert, Vandermeeren, & Cohen, 2009; Liang et al, 2007; Parikh & Cole, 2011; Weigelt & Bock, 2010) underscore the nervous system’s ability to transfer learning, but little work has investigated transfer between more complex, functional tasks. This proof-of-principle study offers the rationale of a new approach for probing changes in motor learning due to transfer that can be applied to a wider range of motor tasks than that which has been tested in previous studies of motor adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor learning is a set of internal processes that cannot be measured directly, but is instead inferred based on behavior (Schmidt & Lee, 1999; Shumway-Cook & Woollacott, 2007). Behavioral changes in components of naturalistic movement, like point-to-point reaching (Kluzik, Diedrichsen, Shadmehr, & Bastian, 2008; Krakauer, et al, 2000; Mattar & Ostry, 2010; Pearson, Krakauer, & Mazzoni, 2010; Pennel, Coello, & Orliaguet, 2002; Seidler, 2007; Shadmehr & Mussa-Ivaldi, 1994) or grasping (Albert, Santello, & Gordon, 2009; Bensmail, Sarfeld, Fink, & Nowak, 2010; Camus, Ragert, Vandermeeren, & Cohen, 2009; Liang et al, 2007; Parikh & Cole, 2011; Weigelt & Bock, 2010) underscore the nervous system’s ability to transfer learning, but little work has investigated transfer between more complex, functional tasks. This proof-of-principle study offers the rationale of a new approach for probing changes in motor learning due to transfer that can be applied to a wider range of motor tasks than that which has been tested in previous studies of motor adaptation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have supported the concept of an internal representation of object properties that can be utilized to predictively scale grip forces (Johansson and Westling, 1988; Flanagan and Wing 1997; Flanagan et al, 2006) for grasping and lifting objects; the basis of these internal representations may be mechanical properties of the object such as weight information (Gordon et al, 1994; Chang et al, 2008) or an internal sense of effort defined by previous forces used to manipulate the object (Bensmail et al, 2009, 2010; Quaney et al, 2003). Regardless of what was encoded, there is also support for the concept of an internal model formed in memory that can be updated by comparing actual somatosensory feedback with the expected somatosensory feedback (Nowak et al, 2004; Bensmail et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of what was encoded, there is also support for the concept of an internal model formed in memory that can be updated by comparing actual somatosensory feedback with the expected somatosensory feedback (Nowak et al, 2004; Bensmail et al, 2010). Matching hand postures in the absence of vision would then occur by matching somatosensory information from the grasping hand to guide control of the matching hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another well-established concept is the hypothesis that an internal model is formed in memory, and it is apparently updated by comparing an efference copy signal related to the expected somatosensory feedback with the actual somatosensory feeback (Nowak et al, 2004; Bensmail et al, 2010). The inverse internal model, by definition, stores mechanical parameters such as the inertia of hand-held objects (Flanders, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%