2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10838-006-7413-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlevel Relations and Manipulative Causality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…patients) of the influence system (cf. Schwenk, 2006). The second advantage refers to the fact that attributes of elementary entities are often measured more easily than those of compound entities.…”
Section: Social Influence and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…patients) of the influence system (cf. Schwenk, 2006). The second advantage refers to the fact that attributes of elementary entities are often measured more easily than those of compound entities.…”
Section: Social Influence and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have discussed a cognitive model of social influence which is based on the idea of ecological rationality (cf. Gigerenzer et al, 1999) in more detail elsewhere (see Schwenk andReimer, 2007, 2008), and only want to state a central assumption at this point. We assume that dyadic influence relations can be sensibly represented by a certain quantity which is attributed by the target person to the influence source.…”
Section: Social Influence and Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%