2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interleukin-4 improves the migration of human myogenic precursor cells in vitro and in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since no induction of IL-4 expression was detected following IGF-1 treatment in human myotube cultures, we propose that IL-4 and IL-13 could share the redundant ability to recruit mononucleated cells for fusion but not toward the same cell populations: IL-4 being responsible for the 'normal' myoblast fusion into nascent myotubes during myogenic differentiation, and IL-13 for additional recruitment of reserve cells during IGF-1-induced hypertrophy. This hypothesis was reinforced by the fact that exogenous treatment by IL-13 at the time of differentiation induction induces the same increase in fusion index as when it was added after 3 days of differentiation (data not shown); on the contrary, we observed that IL-4 did not induce any change in the final fusion index when added either at the time of differentiation induction (data not shown) or after 3 days of differentiation, in accordance with previous studies on human and mice myoblasts (Horsley et al, 2003;Lafreniere et al, 2006).We also tested the involvement of IL-15 as a candidate for the activation of reserve cells, since it has been shown to be involved in myotube hypertrophy in mouse, bovine and human myoblasts (Quinn et al, 2002). Although we were able to confirm the expression of IL-15 in human myotubes, we did not observe any increase in IL-15 expression following IGF-1 treatment.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since no induction of IL-4 expression was detected following IGF-1 treatment in human myotube cultures, we propose that IL-4 and IL-13 could share the redundant ability to recruit mononucleated cells for fusion but not toward the same cell populations: IL-4 being responsible for the 'normal' myoblast fusion into nascent myotubes during myogenic differentiation, and IL-13 for additional recruitment of reserve cells during IGF-1-induced hypertrophy. This hypothesis was reinforced by the fact that exogenous treatment by IL-13 at the time of differentiation induction induces the same increase in fusion index as when it was added after 3 days of differentiation (data not shown); on the contrary, we observed that IL-4 did not induce any change in the final fusion index when added either at the time of differentiation induction (data not shown) or after 3 days of differentiation, in accordance with previous studies on human and mice myoblasts (Horsley et al, 2003;Lafreniere et al, 2006).We also tested the involvement of IL-15 as a candidate for the activation of reserve cells, since it has been shown to be involved in myotube hypertrophy in mouse, bovine and human myoblasts (Quinn et al, 2002). Although we were able to confirm the expression of IL-15 in human myotubes, we did not observe any increase in IL-15 expression following IGF-1 treatment.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…The paradoxical effects of IL-4 on rhabdomyosarcoma could be reconciled with the physiologic activities of IL-4 by taking into consideration recent results showing that IL-4 is not required for fusion between mononuclear myoblasts, but for myotube maturation and also for myoblast migration (30). Therefore, IL-4 fosters normal myogenesis by stimulating the movement of precursors towards pre-existing myotubes and favoring myotube accretion through fusion with incoming myoblasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some factors modulate the velocity or direction of cell migration, whereas others regulate the clearance of the extracellular matrix at the leading edge of migrating cells, thereby enhancing cell motility (Horsley et al, 2003;Jansen and Pavlath, 2006;Lafreniere et al, 2006;Griffin et al, 2009). Myoblast fusion in vitro is enhanced by both positive regulators [e.g.…”
Section: Myoblast Migration Recognition and Adhesion In Micementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myoblast fusion in vitro is enhanced by both positive regulators [e.g. CD164 (Bae et al, 2008), interleukin 4 (Il4) (Horsley et al, 2003;Lafreniere et al, 2006), mannose receptor (MR) (Jansen and Pavlath, 2006) and mouse odorant receptor 23 (Mor23; Olfr16 -Mouse Genome Informatics) (Griffin et al, 2009)] and negative regulators [e.g. prostacyclin (Bondesen et al, 2007)] of cell migration.…”
Section: Myoblast Migration Recognition and Adhesion In Micementioning
confidence: 99%