2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.89.107206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlayer Magnetic Coupling Interactions of Two Ferromagnetic Layers by Spin Polarized Tunneling

Abstract: Magnetic interactions involving ferromagnetic layers separated by an insulating barrier have been studied experimentally on a fully epitaxial hard-soft magnetic tunnel junction: Fe/MgO/Fe/Co. For a barrier thickness below 1 nm, a clear antiferromagnetic interaction is observed. Moreover, when reducing the MgO thickness from 1 to 0.5 nm, the coupling strength increases up to J=-0.26 erg.cm(-2). This behavior, well fitted by theoretical models, provides an unambiguous signature of the interlayer exchange couplin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
107
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
17
107
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If the barrier is insulating the interlayer exchange, coupling is non-oscillatory and decays exponentially as a function of barrier thickness reflecting the evanescent nature of exchange-mediating states. For example, strong AFM coupling was reported in epitaxial Fe/MgO-Fe junctions [148,149]. Using an FE barrier allows the magnitude of the interlayer exchange coupling to be affected by FE polarization orientation [150].…”
Section: (D) Interlayer Exchange Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the barrier is insulating the interlayer exchange, coupling is non-oscillatory and decays exponentially as a function of barrier thickness reflecting the evanescent nature of exchange-mediating states. For example, strong AFM coupling was reported in epitaxial Fe/MgO-Fe junctions [148,149]. Using an FE barrier allows the magnitude of the interlayer exchange coupling to be affected by FE polarization orientation [150].…”
Section: (D) Interlayer Exchange Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike a metallic spacer layer, the tunneling barrier leads to nonoscillatory coupling which decays exponentially as a function of the barrier thickness [18], [19], [20], [21]. Experimental observations of IEC have been reported for only two systems-Fe-MgO-Fe [16] and Fe-Si-Fe [17]. In both cases large coupling strength is observed comparable to that of metallic spacers.…”
Section: Iecmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…IEC in Fe-MgO-Fe MTJs was found to be AFM for small barrier thickness but changes sign for thicker barriers [16]. It is not clear, however, whether the switching is caused by magnetostatic interaction due to interface roughness or has intrinsic origin.…”
Section: A Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations