Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlayer closed-loop control of forming geometries for wire and arc additive manufacturing based on fuzzy-logic inference

Abstract: Dr. Yongzhe Li conceived the theory, designed experiments and wrote the paper. Xinlei Li contributed to the implementation work. Prof. Guangjun Zhang initialized and supervised the research. Prof. Imre Horváth contributed to the conceptualization work. Qinglin Han helped with the experiments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum deviation of the smoothed curves from the reference line among the four faces was then taken as the local imperfection amplitude of each specimen emax, as reported in Table 4. The maximum measured imperfection values typically lie between about 0.5 mm and 2.0 mm; these are higher than the imperfection values typically observed in conventionally formed sections (Meng and Gardner, 2020;Schafer and Pekoz, 1998) and similar to the dimensional accuracy of around ± 1.0 mm to ± 2.0 mm generally quoted for WAAM elements (Kumar et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020;Laghi et al, 2019). There was no clear link in the limited dataset between the imperfection amplitude and either the thickness or width of the examined specimens.…”
Section: Local Geometric Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The maximum deviation of the smoothed curves from the reference line among the four faces was then taken as the local imperfection amplitude of each specimen emax, as reported in Table 4. The maximum measured imperfection values typically lie between about 0.5 mm and 2.0 mm; these are higher than the imperfection values typically observed in conventionally formed sections (Meng and Gardner, 2020;Schafer and Pekoz, 1998) and similar to the dimensional accuracy of around ± 1.0 mm to ± 2.0 mm generally quoted for WAAM elements (Kumar et al, 2020;Li et al, 2020;Laghi et al, 2019). There was no clear link in the limited dataset between the imperfection amplitude and either the thickness or width of the examined specimens.…”
Section: Local Geometric Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…However, several fundamental and practical challenges need to be addressed to fully adopt the CSAM technology in commercial applications. One of these is geometric control, which is a common problem for other high production rate additive manufacturing (HPRAM) processes, including Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) [15,16] and Laser Cladding (LC) [17,18]. Poor geometric control places many limitations on applying HPRAM technologies; examples include varying geometric quality, difficulty producing complex geometries, and geometry-induced property variations [7,8,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karuthapani et al [19] studied the relationship between GMAW parameters and macrostructural characteristics and developed a fuzzy logic model to predict the effect of the flat electrode. Li et al [20] proposed a novel controlling mechanism for improving the fabrication accuracy rate with fuzzy logic inference. Xie et al [21] developed a comprehensive evaluation of welding quality using the fuzzy logic controller.…”
Section: Related Work In Fuzzy Logic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%