“…Chemical degradation of proteins, such as deamidation, is not per se a focus area of proteomics, and as such, detailed focus has not been on avoiding these modifications during sample preparation. One example of a commonly used legacy step is the acidification of samples after proteolytic digestion, to inactive protease and prevent high pH-induced deamidation, the latter being a key focus area of MAM communities. , Typically from 0.1 to 2% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is used for acidification in MAM workflows. ,,, At neutral and basic pH, Asn deamidation proceeds through a succinimide intermediate to form Asp and isoAsp, a well known and major degradation pathway for many biopharmaceutical proteins and a typical focus area in MAM sample preparation workflows. , However, at low pH (<3), deamidation can occur through direct acid-catalyzed hydrolysis to form Asp only, so excessive acidification can potentially be an issue in MAM workflows. , In our laboratory, observations indicated potential deamidation stability issues with acidified samples after prolonged storage in an autosampler (unpublished observations). For the above reasons and because our current digestion workflow employs an enzyme immobilized on magnetic beads, which are removed after digestion (i.e., no enzyme inactivation is required after digestion), we decided to do an in-depth evaluation of the impact and necessity of the post-digest acidification step.…”