Interkit Reproducibility of the Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay on HEp-2 Cells Depends on the Immunofluorescence Reactivity Intensity and Pattern

Abstract

IntroductionThe indirect immunofluorescence assay on HEp-2 cells (HEp-2/IFA) is used worldwide for screening for autoantibodies to cellular antigens. Cell culture and fixation methods influence the cell distribution of autoantigens and the preservation of epitopes. Therefore, discrepancy of results obtained using different HEp-2/IFA kits (interkit nonreproducibility) is a common phenomenon in the clinical laboratory routine.ObjectiveThis study evaluated the interkit nonreproducibility of HEp-2/IFA results using samples from patients with systemic autoimmune disease (SAD), nonautoimmune diseases (NAD), and healthy blood donors (HBD).MethodsSerum from 275 SAD patients, 293 NAD patients, and 300 HBD were processed at 1:80 dilution using four HEp-2 kits according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Interkit reproducibility was determined for positive/negative results and patterns. The agreement of positive/negative results among kits for each sample was determined as the reactivity agreement score (RAS). The pattern reproducibility score (PRS) in each sample was calculated as a function of the number of kits showing equivalent patterns. Qualitative variables and ordinal variables were analyzed by the Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively.ResultsA total of 402 samples were nonreactive in all kits and were considered devoid of autoantibodies. Further analysis included the 466 reactive samples (238 SAD, 119 NAD, 109 HBD). Reactivity to the nucleus had the highest interkit reproducibility (RAS = 83.6), followed by the metaphase plate (RAS = 78.9), cytoplasm (RAS = 77.4), and nucleolus (RAS = 72.4). Interkit reproducibility was higher in SAD (RAS = 78.0) than in NAD (RAS = 70.6) and HBD (RAS = 71.3) groups. Samples with strong reactivity (++++/4 and +++/4) had higher interkit reproducibility than those with weak reactivity (+/4). In the SAD group, RAS for nuclear reactivity was 87.5% for strongly reactive samples as opposed to 4.4% for weakly reactive samples, and the same was observed for NAD and HBD samples. The most robust patterns were the centromere AC-3 (PRS = 78.4), multiple nuclear dots AC-6 (PRS = 73.6), nuclear coarse speckled AC-5 (PRS = 71.3), nuclear homogeneous AC-1 (PRS = 67.9), and the reticular cytoplasmic AC-21 (PRS = 68.6).ConclusionInterkit nonreproducibility in HEp-2/IFA is prevalent and occurs with the highest frequency with weakly reactive samples. International initiatives with the engagement of in vitro diagnostic industry are encouraged to promote the harmonization of the properties and performance of HEp-2/IFA commercial kits.

The presence of autoantibodies is associated with improved overall survival in lung cancer patients

“…Monkey liver tissue is helpful to determine fluorescence patterns, especially in some undistinguishable patterns. The fluorescence characteristics in monkey liver tissue are key points of identification, thus avoiding mistakes ( 23 , 24 ). In the first incubation step, specific antibodies from the diluted patient sample bind to the solid-phase bound antigens.…”

A Strainer-Based Platform for the Collection and Immunolabeling of Mouse Intestinal Organoids

“…However, significant challenges exist in the process of organoid cleaning and immunolabeling. Traditional cell cleaning and immunolabeling procedures are typically performed using cell culture plates or dishes [25,26]. Cells generally adhere firmly to the bottoms of these plates or dishes, and this facilitates the cleaning and immunolabeling processes.…”

Complex patterns on HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay in a large sample referred for anti-cell autoantibodies detection

“…Its reactivity reflects a heterogeneous profile of autoantibodies and unlike the AC-2 pattern, its presence is associated with several clinical conditions (39,40). Besides, the BAC-3 positive samples usually do not show high reactivity on HEp-2 cells and the presence of another antibody in higher concentration may make its accurate identification extremely difficult (7,41). The AC-1, AC-2 and BAC-3 immunofluorescence patterns are presented in Figure 4.…”