Interjurisdictional Spillovers, Decentralized Policymaking, and the Elasticity of Capital Supply

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Interjurisdictional Spillovers, Decentralized Policymaking and the Elasticity of Capital Supply Abstract This paper points to the important role which the elasticity of aggregate capital supply with respect to the net rate of return to capital plays for the efficiency of policymaking in a decentralized economy with mobile capital and spillovers among jurisdictions. In accordance with previous studies, we show that under the assumption of a fixed capital supply (zero capital supply elasticity) the decentralized policy choice is optimal. If the capital supply elasticity is strictly positive, however, capital tax rates are inefficiently low in the decentralized equilibrium. JEL-Code: H23, H77, Q58. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

A Public Finance Perspective on Climate Policy: Six Interactions That May Enhance Welfare

“…Exceptions are the classical double-dividend discussion (Goulder, 1995b(Goulder, , 2013) and a few applications to the problem of tax competition (Eichner and Runkel, 2012;Habla, 2014;Franks et al, 2015). But in an economy that will be significantly constrained by (mitigated or unmitigated) climate change (IPCC, 2014) the field should take ramifications of climate policy into account more, as the analysis of the major effects above has shown.…”

Local Taxation, Private-Public Consumption Complementarity, and the Optimal Number of Jurisdictions

“…Eichner and Runkel [11] argue that "If the capital supply elasticity is strictly positive,… capital tax rates are inefficiently low in… decentralized equilibrium." This should not be the case under general equilibrium, prompting in turn a discussion of the burgher as follows.…”

Self-enforcing environmental agreements and capital mobility

“…Ogawa and Wildasin (2009) extend the analysis to account for transboundary pollution (spillovers) and asymmetric countries, and still get efficient capital tax rates. Eichner and Runkel (2012) point out that it is the zero capital supply elasticity which drives Ogawa and Wildasin's result. They adopt a two-period framework employed e.g.…”

“…Ogawa and Wildasin (2009) and Eichner and Runkel (2012) investigate the (in)efficiency of capital tax competition in the presence of transboundary pollution when decision-making is decentralized, i.e. when all jurisdictions/countries act non-cooperatively.…”

“…when all jurisdictions/countries act non-cooperatively. Here we will take up the analytical framework of Eichner and Runkel (2012) with some minor simplifications 3 to investigate the formation of stable coalitions when the fringe countries as well as the coalition play Nash. Although our approach shares with Eichner and Pethig (2013b) both Nash behavior on the part of the coalition and international trade, the pertaining models differ significantly.…”