1974
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/197408r200051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interior maximum norm estimates for some simple finite element methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the triangulation is uniform, we obtain the following This local result also follows from the proof of Theorem 1, if one multiplies the Taylor polynomial p of u at the point z e s o by some smooth cut-off function ;(, separating f2 o from the corner points of 0f2, and observes that u eH2(f2) C 2 + e(o(.~ supp (Z))-For a uniform triangulation with rectangular triangles the above logarithm free error estimate has been proven in [5], and earlier by finite difference methods in [2]. The estimate (3.18) even holds true if the triangulation is only required to be uniform in some subdomain containing f2 o.…”
Section: I~(z;u-p)lmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…If the triangulation is uniform, we obtain the following This local result also follows from the proof of Theorem 1, if one multiplies the Taylor polynomial p of u at the point z e s o by some smooth cut-off function ;(, separating f2 o from the corner points of 0f2, and observes that u eH2(f2) C 2 + e(o(.~ supp (Z))-For a uniform triangulation with rectangular triangles the above logarithm free error estimate has been proven in [5], and earlier by finite difference methods in [2]. The estimate (3.18) even holds true if the triangulation is only required to be uniform in some subdomain containing f2 o.…”
Section: I~(z;u-p)lmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Interior maximum norm estimates, in cases where the spaces 5" are defined on uniform ("regular", "translation invariant") meshes, were given in Bramble, Nitsche and Schatz [3], Bramble and Schatz [5], Bramble and Thome'e [6], and Strang and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…THEOREM 3.3. Let u be the solution of (1.1) and " that of (3.40) with 0=/hv, we have, for n >= 1, + k log Ilu,,(o)ll,+ Ilu.,(o)ll + (llu.,ll,+ Ilu..ll) as Before we prove this theorem, note that in the same way as for the standard Crank-Nicolson scheme, our result implies IIv(" R,U"-'/2)IIL <--C(u) h 2 log 1_+ k2 log h and ( <-_ C(u) h 2 log + k 2 We now start to prove our result. This time we may write (3.41) "-Rau" =(Jn--h--)'+'(h--Uh)bln --+(Rh-Rh)un.…”
Section: Oxmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Such a result may be combined with known logarithm-free maximum-norm error estimates for the elliptic problem from, e.g., Lin, Lfi, and Shen [11] (for strongly regular triangulations) or Bramble and Thome [2] (interior estimates for uniform triangulations) to derive complete O(h) maximum-norm error estimates for the parabolic problem.…”
Section: Vxes T>omentioning
confidence: 99%