2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2004)130:2(123)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interior Floodplain Flood-Damage Reduction Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is sometimes alternately composed in terms of probability of nonexceedance as the so‐called total probability theorem. This approach is used by Dyhouse [1985] in calculating coincident flooding at the junction of rivers and by Pingel and Ford [2004] in estimating internal flooding in areas surrounded by levees.…”
Section: New Scs‐cn Methods Explainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is sometimes alternately composed in terms of probability of nonexceedance as the so‐called total probability theorem. This approach is used by Dyhouse [1985] in calculating coincident flooding at the junction of rivers and by Pingel and Ford [2004] in estimating internal flooding in areas surrounded by levees.…”
Section: New Scs‐cn Methods Explainedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the area under the AD curve, namely EAH, predicts the likelihood of inundated areas of mulapos occurring in any given year. This indicator proposed by Matella and Jagt () was considered analogous to expected annual damages (EAD) used in flood risk analysis (Pingel and Ford, ). As this indicator integrates all the events, including the extremes, it is equivalent to an average over the whole period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shafiei and Bozorg Haddad (2005) determined an optimal set back of flood control options along the river based on the land use value. Pingel and Ford (2004) described how standard-of-practice models within a coincident-frequency analysis framework can be used to evaluate the flood damage potential with a variety of proposed damage-reduction measures. Olsen et al (2000) developed a dynamic approach for floodplain management considering future change in land use, river characteristics, economical development and climate change in a watershed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%