1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1981.tb00331.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interim report on DMF‐reduction 16 years after the introduction of a preventive program

Abstract: Supervised toothbrushing with fluoride containing preparations and information on prevention of dental disease was introduced in 1963/64 for the majority of schools in the Canton of Zurich. Standardized examinations were carried out every 4 years, starting in 1963. From 1963 to 1979, DMFT levels decreased by 58-60%. Reductions of DF counts were highest in free smooth surfaces of molars and in anterior teeth, exceeding 90%. In contrast, pit and fissure carious lesions were reduced by 55%. Approximal caries also… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The slow but continuous progression of approximal caries and the relatively high prevalence of enamel caries at 21 suggest that for approximal surfaces in a long-term perspective, the fluoride supplements simply retard the progression of caries. This is in accordance with Marthaler [1981], who in a report on the effect of water fluoridation observed that while the prevalence of new approximal enamel lesions in 12-to 14-yearolds did not show any substantial decrease, the number of dentin lesions was markedly reduced. Also Groeneveld [1985], comparing the number of approximal enamel lesions in a fluoridated and a non-fluoridated area, in children from 9 to 18, found only a small retardation in the initiation of approximal lesions, while caries progression beyond the stage of enamel caries was markedly reduced in the fluoridated area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The slow but continuous progression of approximal caries and the relatively high prevalence of enamel caries at 21 suggest that for approximal surfaces in a long-term perspective, the fluoride supplements simply retard the progression of caries. This is in accordance with Marthaler [1981], who in a report on the effect of water fluoridation observed that while the prevalence of new approximal enamel lesions in 12-to 14-yearolds did not show any substantial decrease, the number of dentin lesions was markedly reduced. Also Groeneveld [1985], comparing the number of approximal enamel lesions in a fluoridated and a non-fluoridated area, in children from 9 to 18, found only a small retardation in the initiation of approximal lesions, while caries progression beyond the stage of enamel caries was markedly reduced in the fluoridated area.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Other studies have also observed the limited effect of fluoride exposure to reduce the occurrence of enamel lesions. 29,30 In this study there was also a potential for misclassification of fluoride exposure because exposure was based on the child's reported place of residence rather than a direct measure of exposure. However, the misclassification would have been non-differential misclassification, the effect of which would have been to lead the estimate towards the null effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, Manji et al showed that the model predicted the apparently enigmatic findings in the Netherlands fluoridation studies [Backer Dirks et al, 1961;Marthaler, 1981;Groeneveld, 1985] where the effect of water fluoridation was most pronounced when caries was diagnosed at cavity level, whereas when early enamel demineralized lesions are included in the diagnosis, there would be no significant differences.…”
Section: The Biofilm and The Response Of The Dental Hard Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%