2004
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.072843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interhemispheric interaction between human dorsal premotor and contralateral primary motor cortex

Abstract: We used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in a paired pulse protocol to investigate interhemispheric interactions between the right dorsal premotor (dPM) and left primary motor cortex (M1) using interstimulus intervals of 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16 and 20 ms in ten healthy subjects. A conditioning stimulus over right dPM at an intensity of either 90 or 110% resting motor threshold (RMT) suppressed motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle by stimulation of left M1. Maxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
166
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(40 reference statements)
13
166
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, they are in accordance with a number of studies which used electrophysiological approaches, particularly TMS (Ferbert et al, 1992;Mochizuki et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2007) to confirm the role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Also, they are in accordance with a number of studies which used electrophysiological approaches, particularly TMS (Ferbert et al, 1992;Mochizuki et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2007) to confirm the role of the corpus callosum in interhemispheric inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Previous IHI studies have generally focussed on the M1 regions, yet it is possible that other interhemispheric interactions could explain the greater activity in other cortical regions. For example it has been shown that activity in the PMd can inhibit the contralateral M1 (Mochizuki et al 2004), therefore the higher activity that was observed in the bilateral condition may offset some of the inhibition from other sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early and strong facilitation was associated with better performance in bimanual antiphase movements, whereas delayed facilitation was found in subjects with poor anti-phase stability. In previous studies, it has been demonstrated that while resting hands, interhemispheric PMd-M1 interactions are inhibitory (Mochizuki et al, 2004;Ni et al, 2009) but may turn into strictly timed and short-lasting facilitation during the premovement period (Koch et al, 2006;O'Shea et al, 2007;Liuzzi et al, 2010). By combining TMS and fMRI, Bestmann et al (2008) showed that a TMS pulse over the PMd elicits different effects on the motor regions of the opposite hemisphere depending on the state of the motor system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%