2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interhemispheric cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation of the prefrontal cortex jointly modulates frontal asymmetry and emotional reactivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, in the first demonstration of ccPAS in the cognitive domain, we reported putative cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical effects of ccPAS of the pre-supplementary motor area and inferior frontal cortex on inhibitory behaviour as a function of age (Kohl et al., 2018). This study was followed by a second report of ccPAS in the cognitive domain, which found effects on attentional bias accompanied by bidirectional changes in frontal interhemispheric connectivity depending on the order of stimulation (Zibman, Daniel, Alyagon, Etkin, & Zangen, 2019), replicating the order-dependent effects observed in motor ccPAS (Veniero, Ponzo, & Koch, 2013). Recently, an innovative ccPAS study using resting-state connectivity measures to acquire individualised parietal and prefrontal stimulation targets found bidirectional effects on spontaneous and task-evoked networks (default mode and task-positive) (Santarnecchi et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, in the first demonstration of ccPAS in the cognitive domain, we reported putative cortico-cortical and cortico-subcortical effects of ccPAS of the pre-supplementary motor area and inferior frontal cortex on inhibitory behaviour as a function of age (Kohl et al., 2018). This study was followed by a second report of ccPAS in the cognitive domain, which found effects on attentional bias accompanied by bidirectional changes in frontal interhemispheric connectivity depending on the order of stimulation (Zibman, Daniel, Alyagon, Etkin, & Zangen, 2019), replicating the order-dependent effects observed in motor ccPAS (Veniero, Ponzo, & Koch, 2013). Recently, an innovative ccPAS study using resting-state connectivity measures to acquire individualised parietal and prefrontal stimulation targets found bidirectional effects on spontaneous and task-evoked networks (default mode and task-positive) (Santarnecchi et al., 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…There are several important caveats to our claims. The novelty of this approach [with different ccPAS only having been used in the cognitive domain twice before (Kohl et al., 2018, Zibman et al., 2019)] requires replication in larger studies, as well as specific investigations of its neural basis using other techniques. In addition, any effects we report (both null and positive) require confirmation in a clinically-relevant group, as it is unclear if our results will generalise to populations with disordered decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, traditional methods of electroencephalography (EEG) analysis, including alpha power [ 12 ], amplitude [ 13 ] and coherence [ 14 ], were widely used in studies of hemispheric asymmetry during different emotional states. During emotional processing, mutual connections exist between various brain regions, which function synergistically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since symptom provocation activates the OCD specific circuitry, a deep and broadly stimulating H7 coil will more selectively modulate that circuit. This is an example of Hebbian plasticity (45) induced by TMS, with the specificity of the circuit induced by the provocation (46, 47).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%