1996
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(96)84755-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interhemispheric asymmetry in the auditory evoked fields for pure tone stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern was found regardless of the group, tone category and ear of presentation. Contralateral dominance reflects the cross-over organisation of the ascending auditory pathway and our result concurs with previous human neuroimaging studies in this regard (e.g., Näätänen and Picton, 1987; Kanno et al., 1996; Langers et al., 2005). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This pattern was found regardless of the group, tone category and ear of presentation. Contralateral dominance reflects the cross-over organisation of the ascending auditory pathway and our result concurs with previous human neuroimaging studies in this regard (e.g., Näätänen and Picton, 1987; Kanno et al., 1996; Langers et al., 2005). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In previous studies using tonal stimuli, the right hemisphere was found to exhibit greater N1(m) amplitudes than the left (e.g., Kanno et al, 1996;Fujioka et al, 2003;Seither-Preisler et al, 2003;Soeta and Nakagawa, 2006;Hine and Debener, 2007). These results are not consistent with the present findings regarding the N1m 0 and previous findings regarding the N1 0 .…”
Section: Hemispheric Differencecontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…All of these studies focused on asymmetries in the extent of cortical activation or interhemispheric amplitude differences but little has been reported thus far concerning the temporal dynamics in human brain asymmetries. In one of the rare studies about latency differences, Suzuki et al [1997] and Kanno et al [1996] found faster right hemispheric processing for pure tones compared to the left hemisphere in subjects with left as well as right hemispheric language dominance [Kanno et al, 1996;Suzuki et al, 1997]. In other studies, faster processing in the left hemisphere has been shown for complex visual stimuli [Okubo and Nicholls, 2005] while there was no interhemispheric difference in the latency of visual evoked potentials like the N100 [Abe and Kuroiwa, 1990].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%