Intergroup Relations: Its Linguistic and Communicative Parameters

Reid, Scott A.; Giles, Howard

doi:10.1177/1368430205053938

Cited by 23 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 12 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Being accepted in the group and maintaining relationships that provide trust and support to the participant tend to improve self-esteem (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Communication and language are essential parts of group identity, setting the groups apart from each other (15) . In the case of the studied group, communication was the main force behind learning and the consequent achievement of the goals.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participation, added to cohesiveness and other TFs that integrate the members in group activities, allows them to listen to the contributions or reports from other people and analyze them critically, avoiding misinterpretations (15) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Fatores terapêuticos em grupo de diabéticos

Oliveira

Munari

Bachion

et al. 2009

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Portuguese / English: www.scielo.br/reeusp RESUMO O objetivo da presente pesquisa foi analisar os fatores terapêuticos presentes nos relatos dos participantes de um grupo de diabéticos. Pesquisa exploratória, de avaliação, cujos dados foram obtidos por meio de entrevista semiestruturada, cuja análi-se permitiu a identificação dos seguintes fatores terapêuticos: oferecimento de informações (100%); coesão (100%); universalidade (86%); aprendizagem interpessoal (57%); desenvolvimento de técnicas de socialização (57%); altruísmo (28,5%); comportamento imitativo (28,5%) e instilação de esperança (28,5%). Intervenções grupais, realizadas na promoção do autocuidado às pessoas portadoras de diabetes, podem promover interação benéfica entre os membros, permitindo troca de experiências, compreensão de uma dimensão maior do problema e outras vivências positivas evidenciadas pela presença dos fatores terapêuticos. DESCRITORESEducação em saúde. Diabetes mellitus. Cuidados de enfermagem. Estrutura de grupo. ABSTRACTThe objective of the present research was to analyze the therapeutic factors identified in the accounts of the participants of a group of people with diabetes. An exploratory, assessing research carried out by means of semi-structured interviews pinpointed the following therapeutic factors: information availability (100%); cohesion (100%); universality (86%); interpersonal learning (57%); development of socialization techniques (57%); altruism (28.5%); imitative behavior (28.5%); and hope stimulus (28.5%). The implementation of group intervention actions for the promotion of self-care towards diabetes carriers can generate a beneficial interaction among group members, thus allowing for experience exchange processes, as well as a broader understanding of the disease and other positive experiences evidenced by the presence of the therapeutic factors. KEY WORDSHealth education. Diabetes mellitus. Nursing Care. Group structure. RESUMENEl objetivo de la presente investigación fue analizar los factores terapéuticos presentes en los relatos de los participantes de un grupo de diabéticos. Investigación exploratoria, de evaluación, cuyos datos fueron obtenidos por medio de entrevista semiestructurada; el análisis permitió la identificación de los siguientes factores terapéuticos: ofrecimiento de informaciones (100%); cohesión (100%); universalidad (86%); aprendizaje interpersonal (57%); desarrollo de técnicas de socialización (57%); altruismo (28,5%); comportamiento imitativo (28,5%) e introducción de esperanza (28,5%). Las intervenciones grupales realizadas en la promoción del auto cuidado a las personas portadoras de diabetes pueden promover una interacción benéfica entre los miembros, permitiendo el intercambio de experiencias, la comprensión de una dimensión mayor del problema y de otras vivencias positivas evidenciadas por la presencia de los factores terapéuticos. DESCRIPTORESEducación en salud. Diabetes mellitus. Atención de enfermería. Estructura de grupo.

show abstract

“…Being accepted in the group and maintaining relationships that provide trust and support to the participant tend to improve self-esteem (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Fatores terapêuticos em grupo de diabéticos

Oliveira

Munari

Bachion

et al. 2009

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Since its inception there have been special issues on Information Processing in Groups (Brauner & Scholl, 2000); Social Identity Processes in Organizations (van Knippenberg & Hogg, 2001); Intergroup Contact (Dovidio, Gaertner, & Kawakami, 2003); Evolutionary Approaches to Group Research (Kameda & Tindale, 2004); the Inaugural Group Processes and Intergroup Relations pre-conference from the annual SPSP meeting (Gaertner, Hogg, & Tindale, 2005); Intergroup Relations: Its Linguistic and Communicative Parameters (Reid & Giles, 2005); Lay Theories and Intergroup Relations (Levy, Chiu, & Hong, 2006); Diversity and Intergroup Relations within Organizations (Ensari, Christian, & Miller, 2006); Intergroup Emotions (Giner-Sorolla, Mackie, & Smith, 2007); and, most recently, Social Neuroscience (Prentice & Eberhardt, 2008), with forthcoming special issues on Music and Self-Regulation. In fact, the next review of group processes and intergroup relations research may look very different as the scope and capacity for new approaches expands to such as social neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, multi-level modeling, and the many social identity and intragroup processes researchers move to the organizational fi eld and beyond.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects for Group Processes and Intergroup Relations Research: A Review of 70 Years' Progress

Moura

Leader

Pelletier

et al. 2008

Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nutzungsbedingungen University of KentThree archival analyses are presented substantially extending empirical reviews of the progress of group-related research. First, an analysis of social psychological research from 1935 to 2007 (cf. showed that group-related research has a steadily increasing proportion of titles in the principal journals and currently accounts for over a sixth of all the research in our list of social psychological journals. Second, analysis of the most cited papers from a set of principal social psychology journals from 1998 to 2007 showed that a third of high-impact articles in social psychology focus on groups. Third, analysis of the content of two major specialist journals in the fi eld, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations and Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, showed that together these journals cover a broad range of grouprelated research, and that the only keyword common to both journals was social identity. These fi ndings demonstrate the health and major contributions of research into group processes and intergroup relations to social psychology as a whole.keywords empirical review, group dynamics, group processes, group-related research, intergroup relations, research development narrative and discursive reviews by extending the time period to over 70 years, analyzing impact over the last 10 years, and exploring the themes covered over that period.There have been several reviews, comments, empirical analyses, and overviews of the nature of group research in social psychology (e.g. Bettenhausen, 1991;Davis, 1996;Jones, 1985;Levine & Moreland, 1990Manstead, 1990;McGrath, 1978McGrath, , 1997McGrath & Altman, 1966;McGrath & Kravitz, 1982;Moreland, Hogg, & Hains, 1994;Poole & Hollingshead, 2005;Sanna & Parks, 1997;Simpson & Wood, 1992;Steiner, 1974Steiner, , 1983Steiner, , 1986Tindale & Anderson, 1998;Wheelan, 2005;Wittenbaum & Moreland, 2008;Zander, 1979).Collectively, these reviews provide various insights into the theory, methodology, analysis, and applications of research in group processes and intergroup relations. According to many of the reviews mentioned earlier, group processes and intergroup relations research is central to social psychology. This feeling is characterized in many prefaces, editorials, and introductory paragraphs. However, recent reviews of research into group processes have noted that much of the research literature focuses on the individual (e.g. Wittenbaum & Moreland, 2008). Indeed, the shift in the Zeitgeist away from small groups and toward social cognition approaches was probably at the heart of Steiner's (1986) concerns, and may to some extent represent a struggle for supremacy of different levels of analysis and methodological approaches in social psychology (Abrams & Hogg, 2004;McGrath & Altman, 1966). In fact, Hornsey (2008) recently noted that some researchers have considered groups as "something of a label of convenience for what happened when interpersonal processes were aggregated" (p. 204). Commentators have linked this trend t...

show abstract

“…Under SIT, social group membership necessarily results in negative attitudes toward, and unfavorable comparison of, outgroup members. Numerous language attitudes studies have shown that language attributes signal group membership status (Bresnahan & Kim, 1993;Bresnahan, Ohashi, Nebashi, Liu, & Shearman, 2002;Giles, Hewstone, Ryan, & Johnson, 1987;Reid & Giles, 2005;Ryan, 1983;White & Li, 1991) and are therefore at the very core of intergroup behavior.…”

Section: Previous Researchmentioning

confidence: 97%

Defining the cognitive mechanisms underlying reactions to foreign accented speech

Pantos¹

2012

RCL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the notable exception of the application of the metonymy model to explain stereotyping (Kristiansen, 2001), sociolinguistic language attitudes research has typically focused exclusively on explicit attitudes toward foreign accents without providing a cognitive model to explain how such attitudes are formed. At the same time, researchers in other fields have proposed the use of specific cognitive processing models such as the Elaboration Likelihood Model (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) to explain the cognitive processes underlying reactions to foreign-accented speakers, without isolating foreign accent as an independent variable and without considering that listeners may possess different explicit and implicit attitudes towards the same speaker (e.g., Frumkin, 2007). Focusing on instances where participants exhibit different explicit attitudes toward the same foreign-accented speaker for different speaker traits (e.g., likeability versus knowledge), the present study seeks to provide a deeper understanding of the nature of reactions to foreign accented speech by testing at which point negative attitudes toward foreign accents are formed and changed. Specifically, this research asks whether interlocutors have uniformly negative immediate associative reactions to foreign accent that are subsequently mitigated for certain judgments by propositional processes to form differing explicit attitudes, or whether the immediate reactions are ambivalent, but subsequently become negative for certain judgments through propositional processes.Keywords: language attitudes, cognitive model, foreign accent, cognitive processing models, explicit and implicit attitudes, nature of reactions to foreign accented speech, negative immediate reactions, propositional processes 428 Andrew J. Pantos

show abstract

Intergroup Relations: Its Linguistic and Communicative Parameters

Cited by 23 publications

References 12 publications

Fatores terapêuticos em grupo de diabéticos

Fatores terapêuticos em grupo de diabéticos

Prospects for Group Processes and Intergroup Relations Research: A Review of 70 Years' Progress

Defining the cognitive mechanisms underlying reactions to foreign accented speech

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About