1975
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(75)90175-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergranular stress-assisted corrosion cracking of austenitic alloys in water-cooled nuclear reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Failures of the fuel cladding, control rod cladding, and core baffle bolts in PWRs have revealed intergranular (IG) fracture similar to the failure observed in the core internals of boiling water reactors (BWRs). 3,4,6 However, because of the low corrosion potential, the typical "threshold" neutron dose for IASCC in PWRs is about one order of magnitude higher than that in BWRs with normal water chemistry. 5 Also, chromium depletion at grain boundaries is considered as less critical for IASCC sensitivity in PWRs than in BWRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] Failures of the fuel cladding, control rod cladding, and core baffle bolts in PWRs have revealed intergranular (IG) fracture similar to the failure observed in the core internals of boiling water reactors (BWRs). 3,4,6 However, because of the low corrosion potential, the typical "threshold" neutron dose for IASCC in PWRs is about one order of magnitude higher than that in BWRs with normal water chemistry. 5 Also, chromium depletion at grain boundaries is considered as less critical for IASCC sensitivity in PWRs than in BWRs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IASCC is clearly not confi ned to a particular reactor design, material, component or water chemistry. For example, stainless steel fuel cladding failures were reported years ago in commercial PWRs and in PWR test reactors (Andresen et al, 1990;Brown Jr et al, 1967;Cheng, 1964Cheng, , 1970Cheng, , 1975Garzarolli, Rubel, & Steinberg, 1984;Hanninen & AhoMantila, 1988;Multer, 1975;Pasupathi & Klingensmith, 1981;Schaffer, 1962;Storrer & Locke, 1970). At the West Milton PWR test loop, intergranular failure of vacuum annealed type 304 stainless steel fuel cladding was observed (Cheng, 1970) in 316 ° C ammoniated water (pH 10) when the cladding was stressed above yield.…”
Section: Plant Data On Iasccmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Subsequent observation made this clearer e.g., by showing a similar effect of the water purity (as measured solution conductivity) on unirradiated and irradiated stainless steel (Figure 4 ). The initial reports of IASCC occurred in the early 1960s (Andresen & Ford, 1995;Andresen, Ford, Murphy, & Perks, 1990a;Armijo, Low, & Wolff, 1965;Brown, Storhok, & Gates, 1967;Bruemmer et al, 1999;Cheng, 1964Cheng, , 1970Cheng, , 1975Cowan & Gordon, 1977;Duncan et al, 1965;Hanninen & Aho-Mantila, 1988;Jacobs & Wozadlo, 1985;Multer, 1975;Pashos et al, 1964;Pasupathi & Klingensmith, 1981;Schaffer, 1962;Scott, 1994;Storrer & Locke, 1970;Was & Andresen, 1992a;2007) and involved intergranular cracking of stainless steel fuel cladding initiating from the water side. Post-irradiation mechanical tests, by comparison, were performed in inert environments at various strain rates and temperatures and exhibited mostly ductile, transgranular cracking.…”
Section: Plant Data On Iasccmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Service failures of fuel cladding, internal structures, and fasteners have been discovered in both boiling water reactors (BWRs) and pressurized water reactors (PWRs). [3][4][5][6][7] Since repair or replacement of structural components at the reactor core regions is extremely difficult and expensive, failures of major internal components could seriously impair the safe and economic operation of LWRs. As nuclear power plants age and accumulated neutron fluence increases in recent years, IASCC has become a progressively more important issue for license renewal and aging management worldwide.…”
Section: Executive Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The CGR at the end of the test period is reported. 3 Lower the load to minimize crack growth prior to changing test conditions. 4 Inadequate load shed resulting in a rising K condition.…”
Section: Cgr and J-r Curve Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%