2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2065638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergovernmental Transfer and the Flypaper Effect – Evidence from Municipalities/Regencies in Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Untuk menguji hipotesis yang telah dirumuskan, penelitian ini pertama-tama menggunakan model sederhana sebagaimana diajukan oleh Kang & Setyawan (2012) dan Solikin (2016). Ada dua alasan yang melandasi penggunaan model yang telah mereka kembangkan.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Untuk menguji hipotesis yang telah dirumuskan, penelitian ini pertama-tama menggunakan model sederhana sebagaimana diajukan oleh Kang & Setyawan (2012) dan Solikin (2016). Ada dua alasan yang melandasi penggunaan model yang telah mereka kembangkan.…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
“…Pertama, dua penelitian ini juga mengoptimalkan data secara nasional, sehingga analogi yang sama dapat digunakan sebagai justifikasi atas penggunaan model tersebut pada penelitian ini. Kedua, penelitian oleh Kang & Setyawan (2012)…”
Section: Metode Penelitianunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is to say that, instead of being a supplementary fund to encourage own-source revenue generation, intergovernmental transfers have rather replaced own-source revenue generation ability of local governments which is contrary to the policy provision of intergovernmental transfers (Zigiene, 2012). Studies have argued that allowing intergovernmental transfers to reduce own-source revenue mobilization erodes local autonomy of local governments and makes local governments an agent for political manipulation of the Central Government, thus re-centralizing the decentralized bodies to serve the political interest of the Central government (Dick-Sagoe, 2013;Kang & Setyawan, 2012;Poschl & Weingast, 2013;Rao & Singh, 1998). This is the main motivation for the conduct of this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%