2014
DOI: 10.2753/ree1540-496x500303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intergovernmental Fiscal Arrangements and Provincial Consumption Risk Sharing in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We split the sample in 1993 because several reforms took place around that time. For example, the tax redistribution reform was implemented in 1994, which consolidated the fiscal power of the central government but also gave more fiscal expenditure discretion to local governments (Lai et al, 2014). This reform provided the central government with more resource to inject funds to the state sector when needed.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We split the sample in 1993 because several reforms took place around that time. For example, the tax redistribution reform was implemented in 1994, which consolidated the fiscal power of the central government but also gave more fiscal expenditure discretion to local governments (Lai et al, 2014). This reform provided the central government with more resource to inject funds to the state sector when needed.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change in the consumption mix could also lead to an unprecedented consumption pattern, including demand and volatility. However, despite the significant amount of literature on consumption volatility in China-such as Chan et al (2014), Du et al (2010Du et al ( , 2011, Lai et al (2014), and Zhao and Hsu (2012)-most of it uses aggregate data at the provincial level, which does not account for the heterogeneity of household consumption goods and thus underestimates household consumption volatility. This paper fills this gap by using China's urban household survey data to assess consumption volatility from the perspectives of heterogeneity in household consumption goods, cross-household differences, and intertemporal dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This change in the consumption mix could also lead to an unprecedented consumption pattern, including demand and volatility. However, despite the significant amount of literature on consumption volatility in China – such as Chan et al (2014), Du et al (2010, 2011), Lai et al (2014) and Zhao and Hsu (2012) – most of it uses aggregate data at the provincial level, which does not account for the heterogeneity of household consumption goods and thus underestimates household consumption volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%